Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fort Scott Vs. Hickman

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 03, 1884

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 6 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Retzer Vs. Wood US Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1883
  2. Wright Vs. Blakeslee US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  3. Warnock Vs. Davis US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  4. Lincoln Vs. French US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  5. Ottawa Vs. Carey US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1883
  6. Bell Vs. Morrison US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1828
  7. U.S. 150 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Fort Scott v. Hickman
    Search
  8. U.S. 150 (1884) Fort Scott v. Hickman
    Search
  9. The construction of section 24 by the Supreme Court of Kansas in Elder v. Dyer
    Search
  10. effective, must be made not to a stranger, but to the creditor or to some one acting for or representing him. Sibert v. Wilder
    Search
  11. Schmucker v. Sibert
    Search
  12. Clawson v. McCune's
    Search
  13. the holders of those bonds. In this connection, it may be observed that by the report of the case of United States v. Fort
    Search
  14. that inference or to leave it in doubt whether the party intended to prolong the time of legal limitation. Roscoe v. Hale
    Search
  15. be an acknowledgment to the creditor as to the particular claim, and it must be shown to have been intentional. Roscoe v. Hale
    Search
  16. deduced from the contents of the writing and all the facts accompanying it, to make such acknowledgment. In Wetzell v. Bussard
    Search
  17. To the same effect are Bell v. Morrison
    Search
  18. Pet. 351, 26 U. S. 362 , and Moore v. Bank
    Search
  19. of Columbia, 6 Pet. 86, 31 U. S. 92 . In Barlow v. Barner
    Search
  20. of the Revised Statutes, equivalent to the special verdict of a jury, Norris v. Jackson
    Search
  21. Copelin v. Insurance
    Search
  22. Insurance Co. v. Folsom
    Search
  23. one, the proper practice is to direct a judgment for the defendant instead of awarding a new trial. National Bank v. Insurance
    Search
  24. Fairfield v. County
    Search
  25. People's Bank v. National
    Search
  26. Kirkbridge v. Lafayette
    Search
  27. Canada Southern R. Co. v. Gebhard
    Search
  28. East St. Louis v. Zebley
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Fort Scott v. Hickman
    Search
  30. Elder v. Dyer
    Search
  31. Sibert v. Wilder
    Search
  32. of United States v. Fort
    Search
  33. Roscoe v. Hale
    Search
  34. In Wetzell v. Bussard
    Search
  35. and Moore v. Bank
    Search
  36. In Barlow v. Barner
    Search
  37. Norris v. Jackson
    Search
  38. National Bank v. Insurance
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial