Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Burgess Vs. Seligman

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 29, 1883

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 19 linked 39 unlinked
Show
  1. Polk's Lessee Vs. Wendell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  2. Thatcher Vs. Powell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1821
  3. Preston's Heirs Vs. Bowmar US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1821
  4. Daly's Lessee Vs. James US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1823
  5. Elmendorf Vs. Taylor US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1825
  6. Jackson Vs. Chew US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1827
  7. Gardner Vs. Collins US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1829
  8. Groves Vs. Slaughter US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1841
  9. Lane Vs. Vick US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1845
  10. Rowan Vs. Runnels US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1847
  11. Williamson Vs. Berry US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  12. Watson Vs. Tarpley US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  13. Pease Vs. Peck US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  14. League Vs. Egery US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1860
  15. Leffingwell Vs. Warren US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1862
  16. Mercer County Vs. Hacket US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1863
  17. Christy Vs. Pridgeon US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1866
  18. Mitchell Vs. Burlington US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1866
  19. Lee County Vs. Rogers US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  20. U.S. 20 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Burgess v. Seligman
    Search
  21. U.S. 20 (1883) Burgess v. Seligman
    Search
  22. In this connection we may properly refer to the decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in the case of Matthews v. Albert
    Search
  23. arising upon a like statute in New York was made by the Commissioners of Appeal of that state in the case of MacMahon v. Macy
    Search
  24. in two cases adversely to the judgment in this, and to the views above expressed. The first case was that of Griswold v. Seligman
    Search
  25. the other, that of Fisher v. Seligman
    Search
  26. decided in February, 1882, in which the former case was substantially followed and confirmed. The case of Griswold v. Seligman
    Search
  27. judgment which it is our duty to apply to the case, we are forced to a different conclusion. The cases of Pease v. Peck
    Search
  28. How. 595, and Morgan v. Curtenius
    Search
  29. and examine in detail the suggestions and authorities adduced by the learned court which decided the cases of Griswold v. Seligman
    Search
  30. and Fisher v. Seligman
    Search
  31. McKeen v. Delancy's
    Search
  32. Shelby v. Gay
    Search
  33. Fullerton v. Bank
    Search
  34. Green v. Neal's
    Search
  35. Carpenter v. Provident
    Search
  36. Carroll v. Sofford
    Search
  37. Smith v. Kernochan
    Search
  38. Van Renesselaer v. Kearney
    Search
  39. Gelpcke v. City
    Search
  40. Seybert v. Pittsburgh
    Search
  41. Havemeyer v. Iowa
    Search
  42. Thomson v. Lee
    Search
  43. Butz v. City
    Search
  44. City v. Lamson
    Search
  45. Olcott v. Supervisors
    Search
  46. U.S. Supreme Court Burgess v. Seligman
    Search
  47. of Matthews v. Albert
    Search
  48. of MacMahon v. Macy
    Search
  49. of Griswold v. Seligman
    Search
  50. of Fisher v. Seligman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial