Citation network
Russell Vs. Allen
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1883
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 163 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Russell v. AllenSearch
-
U.S. 163 (1883) Russell v. AllenSearch
-
hardly been appreciated, it will be convenient to state the substance of them. The case of Baptist Association v. HartSearch
-
That theory has since, upon a more thorough examination of the precedents, been clearly shown to be erroneous. Vidal v. GirardSearch
-
Ould v. WashingtonSearch
-
And the only cases in which this Court has followed the Page 107 U. S. 168 decision in Baptist Association v. HartSearch
-
except in certain cases specified by statute, are not upheld to any greater extent than other trusts. Wheeler v. SmithSearch
-
U. S. 362 . In Beatty v. KurtzSearch
-
a bill in equity to restrain by injunction the heirs of the original owners from disturbing that use. In Inglis v. Sailors'Search
-
judges differed only as to the legal title, and not as to the validity of the charitable trust. In McDonogh v. MurdochSearch
-
and Maryland would have been operative. 15 How. 56 U. S. 404 , 56 U. S. 415 . In Fontain v. RavenelSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Jackson v. PhillipsSearch
-
States if the bequest was valid by the law of the state. 17 How. 58 U. S. 395 -396. Accordingly, in Lorings v. MarshSearch
-
a bequest being valid under the law of Massachusetts as habitually administered in her courts. In United States v. FoxSearch
-
by statute, a devise or bequest for such Page 107 U. S. 171 a purpose is a good charitable gift. Nightingale v. GoulburnSearch
-
Dickson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 125 Mass. 311. In Ould v. WashingtonSearch
-
to the validity of the gift before us, as tending to create a perpetuity, is fully met by the cases of Inglis v. Sailors'Search
-
Sung Harbor, McDonogh v. MurdochSearch
-
and Ould v. WashingtonSearch
-
to the leading case of Downing College, reported under the name of Attorney General Page 107 U. S. 172 v. DowningSearch
-
in Wilmot, 1 Dick. 414, and Ambler 550, 571, and under the name of Attorney General v. BowyerSearch
-
in 3 Ves. 714, 5 Ves. 300, and 8 Ves. 256, and to the recent case of Chamberlayne v. BrockettSearch
-
L.R. 8 Ch. 206. See also Sanderson v. WhiteSearch
-
Odell v. OdellSearch
-
August, 1846, c. 178. This was held by Lord Langdale, Master of the Rolls, in United States v. DrummondSearch
-
of the Rolls. History of Smithsonian Institution, 15, 19, 20, 56, 58, 62. And it was cited as authoritative in Whicker v. HumeSearch
-
S. 173 managed by a board of trustees, is sufficiently definite, is shown by the decisions of this Court in Perin v. CureySearch
-
Hospital, above cited, as well as by that of the House of Lords in Dundee Magistrates v. MorrisSearch
-
in the object, as well as for want of capacity in the trustee to take, was held to be valid. And in Schmidt v. HessSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Russell v. AllenSearch
-
of Baptist Association v. HartSearch
-
Vidal v. GirardSearch
-
Baptist Association v. HartSearch
-
Wheeler v. SmithSearch
-
In Beatty v. KurtzSearch
-
In Inglis v. Sailors'Search
-
In McDonogh v. MurdochSearch
-
In Fontain v. RavenelSearch
-
In United States v. FoxSearch
-
Nightingale v. GoulburnSearch
-
In Ould v. WashingtonSearch
-
of Inglis v. Sailors'Search
-
of Attorney General v. BowyerSearch
-
of Chamberlayne v. BrockettSearch
-
Sanderson v. WhiteSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial