Citation network
Clark Vs. Barnard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 07, 1883
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 436 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
U.S. 436 (1883) Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
demurrer and conferred jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the rights of the state. The case distinguished from Georgia v. JesupSearch
-
rights of the state and the appellees to the fund, to which both claimed title. The case differs from that of Georgia v. JesupSearch
-
as was said by this Court, Mr. Justice Swayne, delivering its opinion in Railroad Company v. HarrisSearch
-
Mississippi Railroad Company v. WheelerSearch
-
The same view was taken in Railway Company v. WhittonSearch
-
in Railroad Company v. VanceSearch
-
U. S. 459 , and in Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company v. AlabamaSearch
-
said the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Hodges v. KingSearch
-
performance was the act of God, or of the law, or of the obligee. Accordingly, it was held by this Court in Taylor v. TaintorSearch
-
cannot be any just compensation decreed for the breach, for, as was said by Lord Chancellor Macclesfield, in Peachy v. DukeSearch
-
stock and of all previous payments thereon has been incurred and declared, the courts refuse to grant relief. Sparks v. ProprietorsSearch
-
Prendergast v. TurtonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Naylor v. SouthSearch
-
Sudlow v. DutchSearch
-
Rhenish Railway Company, 21 Beav. 43. In the case of Sparks v. ProprietorsSearch
-
Lord Chancellor Macclesfield said, in Peachy v. DukeSearch
-
In Powell v. RedfieldSearch
-
repeal the express provisions of a positive statute or defeat their operation in the particular case. In Benson v. GibsonSearch
-
The case of Treasurer v. PattenSearch
-
Page 108 U. S. 458 So in Keating v. SparrowSearch
-
less a statutory forfeiture, and so outside the jurisdiction of a court of equity. In the case of United States v. MontellSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
Georgia v. JesupSearch
-
of Georgia v. JesupSearch
-
Railroad Company v. HarrisSearch
-
Ohio & Mississippi Railroad Company v. WheelerSearch
-
Railway Company v. WhittonSearch
-
Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company v. AlabamaSearch
-
Hodges v. KingSearch
-
Taylor v. TaintorSearch
-
Peachy v. DukeSearch
-
Sparks v. ProprietorsSearch
-
of Sparks v. ProprietorsSearch
-
In Benson v. GibsonSearch
-
of Treasurer v. PattenSearch
-
Keating v. SparrowSearch
-
of United States v. MontellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial