Citation network
Gage Vs. Herring
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 07, 1883
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 640 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Gage v. HerringSearch
-
U.S. 640 (1883) Gage v. HerringSearch
-
two, the new claim covers a combination of the five elements, whether used with or without the two others. Prouty v. RugglesSearch
-
governing reissued patents, stated upon great consideration by this Court at the last term in the case of Miller v. BrassSearch
-
Company, 104 U. S. 350 , and since affirmed in many other cases. James v. CampbellSearch
-
Mathews v. MachineSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Bantz v. PageSearch
-
Johnson v. RailroadSearch
-
for the plaintiffs were not bound to disclaim until after a judgment of this Court upon the question. O'Reilly v. MorseSearch
-
that of the plaintiffs. The defendants have therefore infringed this part also of the plaintiffs' combination. Gold v. ReesSearch
-
combination, and he claims it with equal distinctness. As was said by MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY in Water Meter Company v. DesperSearch
-
no equivalent, in the sense of the patent law, for the automatic action described in the plaintiffs' patent. Eames v. GodfreySearch
-
Murray v. ClaytonSearch
-
Clark v. AdieSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gage v. HerringSearch
-
Prouty v. RugglesSearch
-
of Miller v. BrassSearch
-
James v. CampbellSearch
-
Gold v. ReesSearch
-
Seymour v. McCormickSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial