Citation network
United States Vs. Lee
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 04, 1882
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 196 (1882) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. LeeSearch
-
U.S. 196 (1882) United States v. LeeSearch
-
the owner in person, it avoids such sale and a tender is unnecessary, since it would be of no avail. 5. Bennett v. HunterSearch
-
Wall. 324, Tacey v. IrwinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
id. 549, and Atwood v. WeemsSearch
-
action in thus preventing payment was the equivalent of payment in its effect upon the certificate of sale. Bennett v. HunterSearch
-
Taxey v. IrwinSearch
-
been actually paid or tendered. The proposition is thus expressed by this Court at its last term in the case of Hills v. AlbanySearch
-
decisions to the case before us is denied by counsel on two grounds. The first of these is that the case of Bennett v. HunterSearch
-
tax under this statute existed except by the owner in person. The reply to this is that in the cases of Bennett v. HunterSearch
-
and Taxey v. IrwinSearch
-
from the opinion of Chief Justice Page 106 U. S. 203 Chase, who spoke for the Court in the case of Bennett v. HunterSearch
-
as its substitute of 1863, gave the right to redeem after the sale was made. It is clear, therefore, that Bennett v. HunterSearch
-
and Atwood v. WeemsSearch
-
were decisions construing the substituted seventh section of 1863. In the case of Turner v. SmithSearch
-
possibility of the land being struck off to the United States. Page 106 U. S. 204 In the case of Cooley v. O'ConnorSearch
-
runs in the name of the President and may be served on the Attorney General, as was done in the case of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Briggs v. TheSearch
-
where by the Constitution a state Page 106 U. S. 207 of the Union may be sued in this Court. Railroad Co. v. TennesseeSearch
-
Railroad Company v. AlabamaSearch
-
in the early history of this Court may be seen from the opinions of two of its Justices in the case of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
the same rule. The first recognition of the general doctrine by this Court is to be found in the case of Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
been discussed or the reasons for it given, but it has always been treated as an established doctrine. United States v. ClarkeSearch
-
Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
and will not embarrass the latter by assuming an antagonistic jurisdiction. Such were the cases of The Exchange v. McFaddonSearch
-
down, and which, bearing a close analogy to the one before us, seems decisive of it, is that of the United States v. PetersSearch
-
the money until a better right was established. But the very next case in this Court of a similar character, Meigs v. McClung'sSearch
-
court and of the eminent man who had, only six years before, delivered the opinion in the case of the United States v. PetersSearch
-
the United States of an occupied garrison by the judgment against the officers in charge of it. In Wilcox v. JacksonSearch
-
by counsel on either side, or considered by the Court. There is a very satisfactory reason for this. United States v. PetersSearch
-
Meigs v. McClungSearch
-
and Osborn v. BankSearch
-
the principle was fully discussed, and in the other necessarily decided in the negative. And in Governor of Georgia v. MadrazoSearch
-
most of the judges were still on the bench, including the Chief Justice, who had made those decisions. Osborn v. BankSearch
-
The decree of the circuit court ordering a restitution of the money was affirmed. Grisar v. McDowellSearch
-
not denied, that the property was held for public use by a military officer under orders from the President. Brown v. HugerSearch
-
to be insufficient. These decisions have never been overruled. On the contrary, as late as the case of Davis v. GraySearch
-
Wall. 203, the case of Osborn v. BankSearch
-
the Court has held the principle to be unsound, and in the class of cases like the present, represented by Wilcox v. JacksonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial