Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Ex Parte Boyd

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1881

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 7 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Wayman Vs. Southard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1825
  2. Bank of the United States Vs. Halstead US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1825
  3. Ross Vs. Duval US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1839
  4. Duncan Vs. Darst US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1843
  5. Mccracken Vs. Hayward US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1844
  6. Homer Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1853
  7. Beers Vs. Haughton US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1835
  8. legislation of Congress in furtherance of it, has been repeatedly the subject of consideration in this Court. Palmer v. Allen
    Search
  9. Beers v. Hughton
    Search
  10. of writs of execution for the enforcement of judgments, but also as to all proceedings thereupon. As in Beers v. Haughton
    Search
  11. It is said in argument, by Mr. B. F. Butler, in Mitchell v. Bunch
    Search
  12. Paige (N.Y.) 606, that these provisions of the Revised Statutes were passed in affirmance of the doctrine of Hadden v. Spader
    Search
  13. This case was preceded by the decisions of Chancellor Kent in Hendricks v. Robinson
    Search
  14. Brinkerhoff v. Brown
    Search
  15. and McDermutt v. Strong
    Search
  16. id. 687. In Hendricks v. Robinson
    Search
  17. citing Angell v. Draper
    Search
  18. Stileman v. Ashdown
    Search
  19. Shirley v. Watts
    Search
  20. id. 200. In Brinkerhoff v. Brown
    Search
  21. The opinion cites the case of Taylor v. Hill
    Search
  22. it would not lie against the debtor himself, nor against a third person, to have a general discovery. And in McDermutt v. Strong
    Search
  23. for the purpose of enabling the judgment creditor to apply them to the payment of his judgment. In Mitchell v. Bunch
    Search
  24. the jurisdiction of chancery, independent of the statute, as equally extensive, and refers to the case of Edgell v. Haywood
    Search
  25. He refers, however, to Mountford v. Taylor
    Search
  26. Court. Palmer v. Allen
    Search
  27. Mitchell v. Bunch
    Search
  28. of Hadden v. Spader
    Search
  29. Hendricks v. Robinson
    Search
  30. In Hendricks v. Robinson
    Search
  31. Angell v. Draper
    Search
  32. In Brinkerhoff v. Brown
    Search
  33. of Taylor v. Hill
    Search
  34. McDermutt v. Strong
    Search
  35. In Mitchell v. Bunch
    Search
  36. of Edgell v. Haywood
    Search
  37. Mountford v. Taylor
    Search
  38. Boyle v. Zacharie
    Search
  39. United States v. Knight
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial