Citation network
Taylor Vs. Ypsilanti
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1881
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 60 (1881) U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. YpsilantiSearch
-
U.S. 60 (1881) Taylor v. YpsilantiSearch
-
constitute no defense to an action on the bonds. 2. The Court adheres to the ruling in Township of Pine Grove v. TalcottSearch
-
March 22, 1869, is repugnant to the Constitution of Michigan as expounded by its highest judicial tribunal in People v. SalemSearch
-
Bay City v. StateSearch
-
between railroad corporations and the public. The earliest case, to which our attention has been called is Swan v. WilliamsSearch
-
taxation property used for such purposes. Laws Mich., 1859, p. 551. That law was subsequently amended, and in People v. StateSearch
-
to the amendatory statute reducing the bounty. And the doctrines of that case were reaffirmed in East Saginaw Mfg. Co. v. CitySearch
-
under its contract with the city, and was entitled to the required certificate from the governor -- the case of People v. SalemSearch
-
The conclusion in that case, as thereafter declared in Bay City v. StateSearch
-
at the root of all legislation in aid of railroad companies. We remark in passing that the doctrines of People v. SalemSearch
-
courts of a large majority of the states. It was said by Mr. Justice Clifford, speaking for the Court in Rogers v. BurlingtonSearch
-
subject, in the interest of the public, to governmental control and regulation. Subsequently, in Bay City v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Treasurer, the Supreme Court of Michigan reaffirmed the doctrines of People v. SalemSearch
-
People v. SalemSearch
-
cases, since they are in line with those made in the two to which we have referred. In January, 1872, Talcott v. TownshipSearch
-
in suit were issued. That court, the circuit and district judges concurring, declined to follow the case of People v. SalemSearch
-
Upon writ of error, the judgment was affirmed in this Court at its October Term, 1873. Township of Pine Grove v. TalcottSearch
-
Wall. 666. In the argument here, attention was called to the decisions in People v. SalemSearch
-
and Bay City v. stateSearch
-
Swayne, affirmed the judgment, holding the act to be consistent with the Constitution of Michigan. Railroad Company v. CountySearch
-
Olcott v. SupervisorsSearch
-
said Mr. Chief Justice Taney in Ohio life Ins. Co. v. DeboltSearch
-
So, in The City v. LamsonSearch
-
Again, in Olcott v. TheSearch
-
To the like effect are some very recent decisions of this Court. In Douglass v. CountySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. YpsilantiSearch
-
People v. SalemSearch
-
Swan v. WilliamsSearch
-
People v. StateSearch
-
East Saginaw Mfg. Co. v. CitySearch
-
of People v. SalemSearch
-
Rogers v. BurlingtonSearch
-
Talcott v. TownshipSearch
-
the Constitution of Michigan. Railroad Company v. CountySearch
-
Ins. Co. v. DeboltSearch
-
Olcott v. TheSearch
-
Court. In Douglass v. CountySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial