Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Koshkonong Vs. Burton

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1881

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 9 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Amy Vs. Dubuque US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  2. Jackson Vs. Lamphire US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1830
  3. Sohn Vs. Waterson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  4. Sturges Vs. Crowninshield US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1819
  5. Parker Vs. Kane US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  6. Commissioners of Knox County Vs. Aspinwall US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1858
  7. Aurora City Vs. West US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  8. Town of Genoa Vs. Woodruff US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  9. Ogden Vs. Blackledge US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1804
  10. U.S. 668 (1881) U.S. Supreme Court Koshkonong v. Burton
    Search
  11. U.S. 668 (1881) Koshkonong v. Burton
    Search
  12. separate actions without reference to the maturity or ownership of the bonds. Commissioners of Knox County v. Aspinwall
    Search
  13. Clark v. Iowa
    Search
  14. not from the bonds to which they were originally attached. Page 104 U. S. 673 This upon the authority of Amy v. Dubuque
    Search
  15. into consideration, be given by the new law for the commencement of an action before the bar takes effect. Terry v. Anderson
    Search
  16. Hawkins v. Barney's
    Search
  17. Osborn v. Jaines
    Search
  18. Falkner v. Donman
    Search
  19. its maturity. The general proposition suggested by this question seems to have been determined, in 1865, in Mills v. Town
    Search
  20. To the same effect is Pruyn v. The
    Search
  21. their respective maturities. We remark in this connection that among the authorities cited by the state court in Mills v. Town
    Search
  22. of Jefferson in support of its conclusion is Gelpcke v. City
    Search
  23. In harmony with this view are Aurora City v. West
    Search
  24. Wall. 82, Town of Genoa v. Woodruff
    Search
  25. U. S. 502 , Amy v. Dubuque
    Search
  26. U. S. 470 , and Walnut v. Wade
    Search
  27. U. S. 683 . Another question arises upon this branch of the case. The law of Wisconsin, as declared in Mills v. Town
    Search
  28. of previous legislation prescribing and limiting the rate of interest. It was said by Chancellor Walworth in Salters v. Tobias
    Search
  29. When counsel, in Ogden v. Blackledge
    Search
  30. that declaration was accompanied by a distinct provision in terms changing the preexisting law. In Stockdale v. Insurance
    Search
  31. plaintiff for the amount of the bonds, with interest at the stipulated rate, from their maturity until paid, Spencer v. Maxfield
    Search
  32. Pruyn v. City
    Search
  33. U.S. Supreme Court Koshkonong v. Burton
    Search
  34. of Amy v. Dubuque
    Search
  35. Terry v. Anderson
    Search
  36. Mills v. Town
    Search
  37. Pruyn v. The
    Search
  38. Gelpcke v. City
    Search
  39. and Walnut v. Wade
    Search
  40. Salters v. Tobias
    Search
  41. In Stockdale v. Insurance
    Search
  42. Spencer v. Maxfield
    Search
  43. Christmas v. Russell
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial