Citation network
Cucullu Vs. Hernandez
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1880
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 105 (1880) U.S. Supreme Court Cucullu v. HernandezSearch
-
U.S. 105 (1880) Cucullu v. HernandezSearch
-
Myrtle Grove Plantation, and all his pretended rights in and to the said suit of E. Villavaso, James E. Zunts subrogated, v. AugustusSearch
-
due by his vendor is an interruption of prescription as to that debt, both as to the purchaser and vendor. Cockfield v. FarleySearch
-
Collier v. HisSearch
-
so that it is not merely an interruption but is a suspension of the prescription. Page 103 U. S. 113 Furguson v. GlazeSearch
-
Barrow v. ShieldsSearch
-
mortgagee. The general doctrine as stated has been repeatedly declared by the Supreme Court of Louisiana. Bonin v. DurandSearch
-
Haines v. VerretSearch
-
Seyburn v. DeyrisSearch
-
id. 483. Page 103 U. S. 114 The rule was applied to a witness to the mortgage in the case of Brown v. SadlerSearch
-
to the mortgage from Walker to Cucullu because, in his intervention in the case of Villavaso, Zunts Substituted v. WalkerSearch
-
on a different state of facts from that on which the question arises here. Hernandez, in the suit of Villavaso v. WalkerSearch
-
and as to him no reinscription is necessary. The position of Hernandez in his petition in the case of Villavaso v. WalkerSearch
-
in this case has not been decided against him by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case referred to. See Villavaso v. WalkerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
for there is no averment in the bill to which it can be applied. It is not pertinent to any issue in the case. Whitely v. MartinSearch
-
Smith v. ClarkeSearch
-
Langdon v. GoddardSearch
-
Gordon v. GordonSearch
-
the judgment in the supreme court thereon. The right ceases to be litigious when judgment has been rendered. Marshal v. McCreaSearch
-
the claim inch by inch and up to the court of last resort, cancel it by paying what it cost his adversary. Leftwich v. BrownSearch
-
Pearson v. GriceSearch
-
Rhodes v. HooperSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cucullu v. HernandezSearch
-
Cockfield v. FarleySearch
-
Furguson v. GlazeSearch
-
the Supreme Court of Louisiana. Bonin v. DurandSearch
-
of Brown v. SadlerSearch
-
of Villavaso, Zunts Substituted v. WalkerSearch
-
of Villavaso v. WalkerSearch
-
See Villavaso v. WalkerSearch
-
Whitely v. MartinSearch
-
Marshal v. McCreaSearch
-
Leftwich v. BrownSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial