Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Schurz

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1880

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 2 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. Decatur Vs. Paulding US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1840
  2. Commissioner of Patents Vs. Whiteley US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1866
  3. U.S. 378 (1880) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Schurz
    Search
  4. U.S. 378 (1880) United States v. Schurz
    Search
  5. As this Court decided in McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  6. Cranch 504, and McClung v. Silliman
    Search
  7. existed in the Supreme Court of the District than what is conferred by the above section. This court, in Kendall v. United
    Search
  8. Thus, the argument is precisely the same as it was in Kendall v. United
    Search
  9. repealed, and we think that both of them are retained, with the construction placed on them by this Court in Kendall v. United
    Search
  10. and especially the decisions of this Court, he is entitled to the remedy he asks. From the case of Marbury v. Madison
    Search
  11. persons holding public offices will be compelled to perform certain duties which are merely ministerial. Kendall v. United
    Search
  12. the suit is by the United States to set aside the patent and recover back the title so conveyed, as in United States v. Stone
    Search
  13. for him by the patentee on account of equitable circumstances which entitle the complainant to such relief. Johnson v. Towsley
    Search
  14. the deed, or any act which the party intended to stand for such delivery, became effectual to pass the title. Church v. Gilman
    Search
  15. Butler v. Baker
    Search
  16. Warren v. Swelt
    Search
  17. Hatch v. Hatch
    Search
  18. Title xxxiv. sec. 1, par. 3. Page 102 U. S. 399 In Marbury v. Madison
    Search
  19. The same principle is found in the opinion of the Court, delivered by Mr. Justice Story, in Green v. Liter
    Search
  20. Donner v. Palmer
    Search
  21. Cal. 500. The subject is very fully and ably discussed by Mr. Justice Field in the case of Leroy v. Jamison
    Search
  22. In Marbury v. Madison
    Search
  23. other court than the Court of Claims, and we have decided that that court has no jurisdiction in such a case. Bonner v. United
    Search
  24. over and over again held that in the absence of fraud, the decision of the officers on the facts is final. Johnson v. Towsley
    Search
  25. shall recover of the unsuccessful one the legal costs which he has expended in obtaining his rights. In Kendall v. United
    Search
  26. yet this Court, as shown by the report of the case, rendered judgment for costs against him. In United States v. Boutwell
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Schurz
    Search
  28. McIntire v. Wood
    Search
  29. and McClung v. Silliman
    Search
  30. Kendall v. United
    Search
  31. of Marbury v. Madison
    Search
  32. Johnson v. Towsley
    Search
  33. Church v. Gilman
    Search
  34. Green v. Liter
    Search
  35. of Leroy v. Jamison
    Search
  36. Bonner v. United
    Search
  37. In Kendall v. United
    Search
  38. In United States v. Boutwell
    Search
  39. Kendall v. Stokes
    Search
  40. United States v. Stone
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial