Citation network
Litchfield Vs. County of Webster
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1879
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Litchfield v. CountySearch
-
of Webster - 101 U.S. 773 (1879) U.S. Supreme Court Litchfield v. CountySearch
-
of Webster, 101 U.S. 773 (1879) Litchfield v. CountySearch
-
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Iowa Syllabus 1. Wolsey V. ChapmanSearch
-
These lands are a portion of those which gave rise to a long protracted controversy of which Wolsey v. ChapmanSearch
-
years 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, 1865, and 1866. The facts affecting the title are fully stated in Wolsey v. ChapmanSearch
-
Pacific Railroad Co. v. LitchfieldSearch
-
How. 66, Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
Moines Company, 5 Wall. 681, Riley v. WellsSearch
-
not reported, Williams v. BakerSearch
-
Wall. 144, and Homestead Company v. ValleySearch
-
location, or purchase was made. Laws of Iowa, Rev. 1860, p. 110, sec. 711, par. 7. In The McGregor & M. Railroad Co. v. BrownSearch
-
next year after a patent could be demanded for them. To the same general effect are Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railroad v. CherokeeSearch
-
Goodrich v. BeamanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railroad v. WoodburySearch
-
are part of the school lands selected by the state under the act of 1841, the particulars of which appear in Wolsey v. ChapmanSearch
-
on the part of the state was maintained and constantly asserted adversely to Litchfield until the case of Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
That question remained open until the December Term, 1869, of this Court, when it was settled in the case of Riley v. PageSearch
-
failed to maintain his title, recover from the real owner what he thus advanced. We so held in Homestead Company v. ValleySearch
-
below was right in enjoining the collection of all penalty or interest in excess of six percent per annum. In Stryker v. PolkSearch
-
established by the evidence. Page 101 U. S. 781 It may fairly be inferred from what is said in Litchfield v. CountySearch
-
as we find it to be. Decree affirmed, each party to pay the costs of his own appeal. NOTE -- In Litchfield v. CountySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Litchfield v. CountySearch
-
Dubuque & Pacific Railroad Co. v. LitchfieldSearch
-
Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
Riley v. WellsSearch
-
Williams v. BakerSearch
-
and Homestead Company v. ValleySearch
-
In The McGregor & M. Railroad Co. v. BrownSearch
-
Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railroad v. CherokeeSearch
-
of Wolcott v. DesSearch
-
of Riley v. PageSearch
-
Homestead Company v. ValleySearch
-
In Stryker v. PolkSearch
-
In Litchfield v. CountySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial