Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Watt Vs. Starke

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1879

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 1 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Basey Vs. Gallagher US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  2. U.S. 247 (1879) U.S. Supreme Court Watt v. Starke
    Search
  3. U.S. 247 (1879) Watt v. Starke
    Search
  4. in equity, may impanel a jury and submit to them such questions of fact as it may deem expedient. 4. Harman v. Johnson
    Search
  5. is the depositions taken by the complainant before the trial of the issues. We lately held, in the case of Johnson v. Harmon
    Search
  6. to the court of appeal if an appeal is taken. See Graham, New Trials, by Waterman, vol. iii. p. 1551. In Bootle v. Blundell
    Search
  7. And in another case before the same judge, Barker v. Ray
    Search
  8. It may be disregarded, and a decree rendered contrary to it. See, in addition to the cases cited, Basey v. Gallagher
    Search
  9. would be to decide it upon different case from that upon which it was decided by the court below. Brockett v. Brockett
    Search
  10. directing a new trial of an issue, as stated in Smith's Chancery Practice (Phila. ed.), vol. ii. p. 84 (citing Tatham v. Wright
    Search
  11. s satisfaction that no Page 101 U. S. 254 new trial was necessary. In the case cited by Smith ( Tatham v. Wright
    Search
  12. appellant, but find nothing therein which militates against the views which we have expressed. The case of Salter v. Hite
    Search
  13. both of the Lord chancellor and the House of Lords, was based upon a consideration of the whole matter. Cleeve v. Gascoine
    Search
  14. what has been improperly excluded, the conscience of the chancellor ought to be satisfied. In the case of Watkins v. Carlton
    Search
  15. and that court very properly reversed the decree. As intimated by us in Johnson v. Harmon
    Search
  16. on a motion for a new trial, the proceedings which took place at the trial. This is all that was done in Watkins v. Carlton
    Search
  17. Brockenbrough v. Spindle
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Watt v. Starke
    Search
  19. Harman v. Johnson
    Search
  20. of Johnson v. Harmon
    Search
  21. In Bootle v. Blundell
    Search
  22. Barker v. Ray
    Search
  23. Tatham v. Wright
    Search
  24. of Salter v. Hite
    Search
  25. Cleeve v. Gascoine
    Search
  26. of Watkins v. Carlton
    Search
  27. Johnson v. Harmon
    Search
  28. Watkins v. Carlton
    Search
  29. Brockett v. Brockett
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial