Citation network
Hatch Vs. Dana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1879
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 205 (1879) U.S. Supreme Court Hatch v. DanaSearch
-
U.S. 205 (1879) Hatch v. DanaSearch
-
by the company, and the latter had not called for more than thirty percent of the subscriptions. 2. Pollard v. BaileySearch
-
Wall. 520, and Terry v. TubmanSearch
-
to be made defendants. In such a case, no stockholder can be compelled to pay more than he owes. In Ogilvie v. KnoxSearch
-
for their shares of the capital stock. This case is directly in point, and it does not stand alone. In Bartlett v. DrewSearch
-
what the corporation could not enforce, without any regard to the equities of one against the others. So in Pierce v. TheSearch
-
is true, was a proceeding under a statute, but it was a statute enacting substantially this equity rule. In Marsh v. BurroughsSearch
-
The case of Wood v. DummerSearch
-
Those not sued appear to have been treated only as convenient, not as necessary parties. The cases of Pollard v. BaileySearch
-
U. S. 156 , are not in conflict with Ogilvie v. KnoxSearch
-
could be made. Not a hint was given that the latter case was intended to be questioned or qualified. Indeed, Pollard v. BaileySearch
-
and Terry v. TubmanSearch
-
of equity may enforce payment of stock subscriptions though there have been no calls for them by the company. In Henry v. RailroadSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In the English courts, a mandamus is sometimes awarded to compel the directors to make the necessary calls. Queen v. TheSearch
-
Queen v. LedgardSearch
-
The King v. KatharineSearch
-
remedy can avail only when there are directors. The remedy in equity is more complete, and it is well recognized. Ward v. TheSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. McDanielSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hatch v. DanaSearch
-
In Ogilvie v. KnoxSearch
-
In Bartlett v. DrewSearch
-
Pierce v. TheSearch
-
In Marsh v. BurroughsSearch
-
of Wood v. DummerSearch
-
of Pollard v. BaileySearch
-
Ogilvie v. KnoxSearch
-
Indeed, Pollard v. BaileySearch
-
In Henry v. RailroadSearch
-
Queen v. TheSearch
-
Ward v. TheSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial