Citation network
Cox Vs. National Bank
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1879
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cox v. NationalSearch
-
Bank - 100 U.S. 704 (1879) U.S. Supreme Court Cox v. NationalSearch
-
Bank, 100 U.S. 704 (1879) Cox v. NationalSearch
-
G. v. ThompsonSearch
-
G. v. ThompsonSearch
-
employment in said city. The plaintiff then introduced evidence tending to show that the original bill was sent to G. V. ThompsonSearch
-
is so firmly settled, says Marshall, C.J., that no authority need be cited to support the proposition. Magruder v. BankSearch
-
The Juniata Bank v. HaleSearch
-
Picquet v. CurtisSearch
-
are added, no presentment there at maturity or afterwards is necessary to charge such a party. Foden & Slater v. SharpSearch
-
Wolcott v. VanSearch
-
is not inconsistent with the rule that a written instrument cannot be varied by parol evidence. Brent's Exrs. v. TheSearch
-
designated, and was ready and offered to pay the money, it is matter of defense to be pleaded and proved. Wallace v. McConnellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Rowe v. YoungSearch
-
by agreement, or something appearing in the instrument to indicate a different intention. Bank of the United States v. SmithSearch
-
payable when it fell due at the place designated by the address as the place where the acceptance took place. Halstead v. SkeltonSearch
-
McClane v. FitchSearch
-
place of business, as presumable from such address, or at the residence of either of the firm. Otsego County Bank v. WarrenSearch
-
of the maker or acceptor is elsewhere, the holder is not bound to make demand anywhere except in that town. Smith v. LittleSearch
-
Boot v. FranklinSearch
-
Hine v. AllelySearch
-
pleading that fact and payment of the money into court will be a bar to the recovery of interest and cost. Hills v. PlaceSearch
-
Caldwell v. CassidySearch
-
though no mention was made of any dwelling, store, or place of business where the bill should be presented. Freese v. BrownellSearch
-
Carter v. SmithSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cox v. NationalSearch
-
Magruder v. BankSearch
-
Foden & Slater v. SharpSearch
-
Brent's Exrs. v. TheSearch
-
Halstead v. SkeltonSearch
-
Otsego County Bank v. WarrenSearch
-
Smith v. LittleSearch
-
Hills v. PlaceSearch
-
Freese v. BrownellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial