Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Meeks Vs. Olpherts

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1879

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 26 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 564 (1879) U.S. Supreme Court Meeks v. Olpherts
    Search
  2. U.S. 564 (1879) Meeks v. Olpherts
    Search
  3. the literal meaning of that section, and the bar is good against him. This was decided in the case of Harlan & Huff v. Peck
    Search
  4. said the supreme court in Beckett v. Selover
    Search
  5. cited fully sustain the text, both English and American. Among those specially applicable to this case are Smilie v. Biffle
    Search
  6. Couch's Heirs v. Couch's
    Search
  7. Rosson v. Anderson
    Search
  8. Darnall v. Adams
    Search
  9. surprise that it should ever have been entertained, and showing how it was overruled by Lord Hardwicke in Lewellen v. Mackworth
    Search
  10. In the case of Rosson v. Anderson
    Search
  11. have been barred by the statute, so was the heir, though a minor when the cause of action accrued. In Darnall v. Adams
    Search
  12. the claim of the devisee is, under such circumstances, barred by the lapse of time which bars the executor. Coleman v. Walker
    Search
  13. Metc. (Ky.) 65, and Edwards v. Woolfolk's
    Search
  14. ably discussed and its soundness well maintained. A very strong case of the same character is that of Croxall v. Sherrard
    Search
  15. This was, however, based on the peculiar wording of that statute. Page 100 U. S. 571 In Cuningham v. Ashley
    Search
  16. U.S. Supreme Court Meeks v. Olpherts
    Search
  17. of Harlan & Huff v. Peck
    Search
  18. Beckett v. Selover
    Search
  19. Smilie v. Biffle
    Search
  20. Lewellen v. Mackworth
    Search
  21. of Rosson v. Anderson
    Search
  22. In Darnall v. Adams
    Search
  23. Coleman v. Walker
    Search
  24. and Edwards v. Woolfolk's
    Search
  25. of Croxall v. Sherrard
    Search
  26. In Cuningham v. Ashley
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales