Citation network
Newton Vs. Commissioners
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1879
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 548 (1879) U.S. Supreme Court Newton v. CommissionersSearch
-
U.S. 548 (1879) Newton v. CommissionersSearch
-
aside its sovereignty and contract like an individual, Page 100 U. S. 557 and be bound accordingly. Curran v. StateSearch
-
In the later case of East Hartford v. TheSearch
-
lengthen the term of service. And it may increase or diminish the salary or change the mode of compensation. Butler v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
The Regents v. WilliamsSearch
-
so potent a right. Though the state cannot be sued, its officers, whose acts were illegal and void, may be. Osborn v. BankSearch
-
A proposition leading to such consequences must be unsound. The parent and the offspring are alike. Armstrong v. TheSearch
-
substantially the same with ours touching the eighth section of the act of 1846 here in question. Elwell and Others v. TuckerSearch
-
Adams v. TheSearch
-
County of Logan, 11 Ill. 336, and Bass v. FanthroySearch
-
The rules of interpretation touching such contracts are well settled in this Court. In Tucker v. FergusonSearch
-
of the state to grant what is claimed. Such a purpose cannot be inferred from equivocal language. Providence Bank v. BillingsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Gilman v. CitySearch
-
no matter how long the alleged right has been enjoyed, it may be resumed by the state at its pleasure. Christ Church v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
can be raised by mere inference or presumption, and the right granted must be clearly defined. Charles River Bridge v. WarrenSearch
-
Fertilizing Company v. HydeSearch
-
it there is another and a distinct thing, in regard to which the eighth section of the act is wholly silent. In Mead v. BallardSearch
-
In Harris v. ShawSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Newton v. CommissionersSearch
-
Curran v. StateSearch
-
of East Hartford v. TheSearch
-
Butler v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Armstrong v. TheSearch
-
Elwell and Others v. TuckerSearch
-
Adams v. TheSearch
-
and Bass v. FanthroySearch
-
Court. In Tucker v. FergusonSearch
-
Christ Church v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Charles River Bridge v. WarrenSearch
-
In Mead v. BallardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial