Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Thompson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1878

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 3 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Reeside Vs. Walker US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  2. United States Vs. Buford US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1830
  3. United States Vs. Kirkpatrick US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1824
  4. U.S. 486 (1878) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Thompson
    Search
  5. U.S. 486 (1878) United States v. Thompson
    Search
  6. to find but two cases in the lower federal courts in which it appears the question was raised. They are United States v. Hoar
    Search
  7. Mas. 311, and United States v. Williams
    Search
  8. have been taken for granted, and in no instance to have been discussed either by counsel or the court. United States v. Buford
    Search
  9. Lindsey v. Miller's
    Search
  10. upon the subject, but they concur with those to which we have referred. Among the earliest of them is Stoughton v. Baker
    Search
  11. The examination of the subject by Judge Story in United States v. Hoar
    Search
  12. also upon the basis of universal consent and recognition. They cannot be sued without their consent. United States v. Clark
    Search
  13. defendant, no judgment can be rendered against them, either for such balance or in any case for costs. United States v. Boyd
    Search
  14. How. 272. A judgment in their favor cannot be enjoined. Hill v. United
    Search
  15. States, 9 How. 386. Laches, however gross, cannot be imputed to them. United States v. Kirkpatrick
    Search
  16. Wheat. 720. There is no presumption of payment against them arising from lapse of time. United States v. Williams
    Search
  17. supra. They can maintain a suit in their own name upon a nonnegotiable claim assigned to them. United States v. White
    Search
  18. thus Page 98 U. S. 490 created. It is an exception equally applicable to all governments. United States v. Hoar
    Search
  19. People v. Gilbert
    Search
  20. state legislature in passing the act, as it certainly was not of Congress in enacting the law of 1789. United States v. Hoar
    Search
  21. proceedings except so far as Congress shall allow. This subject was considered in Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. Dearing
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Thompson
    Search
  23. United States v. Hoar
    Search
  24. and United States v. Williams
    Search
  25. Stoughton v. Baker
    Search
  26. United States v. Clark
    Search
  27. Hill v. United
    Search
  28. United States v. Williams
    Search
  29. United States v. White
    Search
  30. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. Dearing
    Search
  31. Gibson v. Chouteau
    Search
  32. United States v. Boyd
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales