Citation network
Davie Vs. Briggs
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1878
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 628 (1878) U.S. Supreme Court Davie v. BriggsSearch
-
U.S. 628 (1878) Davie v. BriggsSearch
-
reconstruction period between Sept. 1, 1861, and Jan. 1, 1870, as required by the statutes of North Carolina ( Johnson v. WinslowSearch
-
Reg. v. LumleySearch
-
id. 265. In the leading case in the Court of Exchequer of Nepean v. DoeSearch
-
Montgomery v. BevansSearch
-
Stevens v. McNamaraSearch
-
Smith v. KnowltonSearch
-
Flynn v. CoffeeSearch
-
Luing v. SteinmanSearch
-
McDowell v. SimpsonSearch
-
Whiting v. NichollSearch
-
Spurr v. TrumbleSearch
-
Cofer v. FlanaganSearch
-
Smith v. SmithSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Prim v. StewartSearch
-
Gibbes v. VincentSearch
-
Hancock v. AmericanSearch
-
Stouvenal v. PageSearch
-
McCartee v. CameeSearch
-
Barb. (N.Y.) Ch. 456. And such seems to be the settled doctrine in North Carolina. In Spencer v. MooreSearch
-
The question again arose in the subsequent case of Spencer v. ReperSearch
-
id. 333, 334, when that court reaffirmed Spencer v. MooreSearch
-
and, referring with approval to the doctrine announced by the Court of King's Bench in Doe dem. Knight v. NepeanSearch
-
as used in statutes of limitation. In Faw v. RoberdeauSearch
-
In Murray's Lessee v. BakerSearch
-
In Bank of Alexandria v. DyerSearch
-
it said that its construction was in harmony with the uniform decisions of the courts of Maryland. In Shelby v. GuySearch
-
satisfactory conclusion upon the question. The Court at the same time decided, as they had previously done in Green v. LesseeSearch
-
of Neal, 6 Pet. 291, and as they subsequently did in Harpending v. DutchSearch
-
Church, 16 Pet. 455, and Leffingwell v. WarrenSearch
-
Carolina, has received a fixed construction in the courts of that state. As early as 1811, in the case of Whitlock v. WaltonSearch
-
That case was approved in Earle v. DicksonSearch
-
to the limitation statute of that state. In so doing, we pursue the precise course marked out in the case of Green v. LesseeSearch
-
In the case of Murray's Lessee v. BakerSearch
-
Supervisors v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Davie v. BriggsSearch
-
Johnson v. WinslowSearch
-
the Court of Exchequer of Nepean v. DoeSearch
-
Cofer v. FlanaganSearch
-
North Carolina. In Spencer v. MooreSearch
-
of Spencer v. ReperSearch
-
Spencer v. MooreSearch
-
Knight v. NepeanSearch
-
In Faw v. RoberdeauSearch
-
of Maryland. In Shelby v. GuySearch
-
Green v. LesseeSearch
-
Harpending v. DutchSearch
-
and Leffingwell v. WarrenSearch
-
of Whitlock v. WaltonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial