Citation network
Keith Vs. Clark
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1878
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 454 (1878) U.S. Supreme Court Keith v. ClarkSearch
-
U.S. 454 (1878) Keith v. ClarkSearch
-
plaintiff. The jurisdiction of this Court is denied again, though it was affirmed in the analogous cases of Woodruff v. TrapnallSearch
-
How. 190, and Furman v. NicholSearch
-
on the merits, to prevent the judgment being used as a bar in some court which might have jurisdiction. Barney v. BaltimoreSearch
-
supra, p. 97 U. S. 423 . 2. In Tennessee v. SneedSearch
-
by state laws. Of that question this Court has jurisdiction, and we proceed to its consideration. In Furman v. NicholSearch
-
of 1865, which is relied on here, was void as impairing the obligation of that contract. The case of Woodruff v. TrapnallSearch
-
of the bank and its relation to the state, and the contract to receive its notes in payment of taxes. In Furman v. NicholSearch
-
escaped the obligations of that Constitution, though for a while she may have evaded their enforcement. In Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
In White v. HartSearch
-
right to representation in Congress, and no readmission into the Union. These cases, and especially that of Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
also held that the notes were not subject to the statute of limitations, and were not bound by it. State of Tennessee v. TheSearch
-
prosecution of that war, is a valid promise or contract, by reason of the turpitude of its consideration. In Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
In Hanauer v. DoaneSearch
-
We have already decided, in the case of Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
The latest expression of the court on the subject was by MR. JUSTICE FIELD, without dissent, in Williams v. BruffySearch
-
See Horn v. LockhartSearch
-
Sprott v. UnitedSearch
-
belong to the state, subject to the payment of its debts. The state, it is true, according to the decision in Curran v. StateSearch
-
and hold that they were usurping governments. I understand this to have been the opinion of this Court in Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
the Chief Justice makes the following quotation from the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Taney in the case of Luther v. BordenSearch
-
The actual course of things taken in the seceding states, so fully detailed by the Chief Justice in Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
the bank was organized, and the relations created between it and the state by its charter, are thus stated in Furman v. NicholSearch
-
by the federal Constitution Page 97 U. S. 480 to impair. Such was the decision of this Court in Furman v. NicholSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Keith v. ClarkSearch
-
of Woodruff v. TrapnallSearch
-
and Furman v. NicholSearch
-
Barney v. BaltimoreSearch
-
In Tennessee v. SneedSearch
-
In Furman v. NicholSearch
-
In Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
of Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
State of Tennessee v. TheSearch
-
Curran v. StateSearch
-
Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
of Luther v. BordenSearch
-
Williams v. BruffySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial