Citation network
Lamborn Vs. County Commissioners
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1877
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Lamborn v. CountySearch
-
Commissioners - 97 U.S. 181 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Lamborn v. CountySearch
-
Commissioners, 97 U.S. 181 (1877) Lamborn v. CountySearch
-
and conveying the same not having been paid. These taxes therefore, as decided by us in the case of Railway Company v. PrescottSearch
-
taxes were legal and valid. On the second day of January, 1874, after the decision of this Court in Railway Company v. PrescottSearch
-
This doctrine has been fully adopted by the Supreme Court of Kansas. Carithers v. WeaverSearch
-
Kurtz v. FisherSearch
-
Hunt v. RousmaniereSearch
-
Bilbie v. LumleySearch
-
Smith, Lead.Cas. 398 (6th ed. 458), notes to Marriot v. HamptonSearch
-
made under a mistaken view of the law, cannot be revoked, and the money so paid cannot be recovered bank. Clarke v. DutcherSearch
-
Ege v. KoontzSearch
-
Boston & Sandwich Glass Co. v. CitySearch
-
Benson & Another v. MonroeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Milnes v. DuncanSearch
-
Stewart v. StewartSearch
-
and see cases cited in note to 2 Smith, Lead.Cas. 403, 404 (6th ed. 466), Marriot v. HamptonSearch
-
remove such detention, may be recovered back unless prohibited by some statutory regulation to the contrary. Elliott v. SwartwurtSearch
-
Ripley v. GelstonSearch
-
Clinton v. StrongSearch
-
and nothing supervening upon the sale except a cloud on the title. This view has been adopted in Kansas. In Phillips v. JeffersonSearch
-
are entitled to the highest respect. We are not aware of any decision which tends to shake the authority of Phillips v. JeffersonSearch
-
County. On the contrary, the same views have been subsequently reiterated. In Wabaunsee County v. WalkerSearch
-
held that he could not recover back even the illegal interest. The court relied on the previous decision in Phillips v. JeffersonSearch
-
The question was again discussed in the recent case of the Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
lands, to avoid or remove a cloud upon the title arising from a tax sale, is a compulsory payment. The case of Stephan v. DanielsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lamborn v. CountySearch
-
of Railway Company v. PrescottSearch
-
the Supreme Court of Kansas. Carithers v. WeaverSearch
-
Marriot v. HamptonSearch
-
Clarke v. DutcherSearch
-
Elliott v. SwartwurtSearch
-
Kansas. In Phillips v. JeffersonSearch
-
of Phillips v. JeffersonSearch
-
In Wabaunsee County v. WalkerSearch
-
Phillips v. JeffersonSearch
-
of the Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
of Stephan v. DanielsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial