Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lamborn Vs. County Commissioners

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1877

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 1 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. Railway Company Vs. Prescott US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1872
  2. Lamborn v. County
    Search
  3. Commissioners - 97 U.S. 181 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Lamborn v. County
    Search
  4. Commissioners, 97 U.S. 181 (1877) Lamborn v. County
    Search
  5. and conveying the same not having been paid. These taxes therefore, as decided by us in the case of Railway Company v. Prescott
    Search
  6. taxes were legal and valid. On the second day of January, 1874, after the decision of this Court in Railway Company v. Prescott
    Search
  7. This doctrine has been fully adopted by the Supreme Court of Kansas. Carithers v. Weaver
    Search
  8. Kurtz v. Fisher
    Search
  9. Hunt v. Rousmaniere
    Search
  10. Bilbie v. Lumley
    Search
  11. Smith, Lead.Cas. 398 (6th ed. 458), notes to Marriot v. Hampton
    Search
  12. made under a mistaken view of the law, cannot be revoked, and the money so paid cannot be recovered bank. Clarke v. Dutcher
    Search
  13. Ege v. Koontz
    Search
  14. Boston & Sandwich Glass Co. v. City
    Search
  15. Benson & Another v. Monroe
    Search
  16. Milnes v. Duncan
    Search
  17. Stewart v. Stewart
    Search
  18. and see cases cited in note to 2 Smith, Lead.Cas. 403, 404 (6th ed. 466), Marriot v. Hampton
    Search
  19. remove such detention, may be recovered back unless prohibited by some statutory regulation to the contrary. Elliott v. Swartwurt
    Search
  20. Ripley v. Gelston
    Search
  21. Clinton v. Strong
    Search
  22. and nothing supervening upon the sale except a cloud on the title. This view has been adopted in Kansas. In Phillips v. Jefferson
    Search
  23. are entitled to the highest respect. We are not aware of any decision which tends to shake the authority of Phillips v. Jefferson
    Search
  24. County. On the contrary, the same views have been subsequently reiterated. In Wabaunsee County v. Walker
    Search
  25. held that he could not recover back even the illegal interest. The court relied on the previous decision in Phillips v. Jefferson
    Search
  26. The question was again discussed in the recent case of the Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Commissioners
    Search
  27. lands, to avoid or remove a cloud upon the title arising from a tax sale, is a compulsory payment. The case of Stephan v. Daniels
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Lamborn v. County
    Search
  29. of Railway Company v. Prescott
    Search
  30. the Supreme Court of Kansas. Carithers v. Weaver
    Search
  31. Marriot v. Hampton
    Search
  32. Clarke v. Dutcher
    Search
  33. Elliott v. Swartwurt
    Search
  34. Kansas. In Phillips v. Jefferson
    Search
  35. of Phillips v. Jefferson
    Search
  36. In Wabaunsee County v. Walker
    Search
  37. Phillips v. Jefferson
    Search
  38. of the Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Commissioners
    Search
  39. of Stephan v. Daniels
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial