Citation network
County of Warren Vs. Marcy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1877
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 96 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court County of Warren v. MarcySearch
-
U.S. 96 (1877) County of Warren v. MarcySearch
-
as the county authorities might determine. This was the very question raised before the state court in Harding v. RockfordSearch
-
of the bonds themselves, by the authorities whose primary duty it is to ascertain it. Commissioners of Johnson County v. JanuarySearch
-
Commissioners of Douglass County v. BollesSearch
-
Lynde v. TheSearch
-
State tribunals) in consequence of irregularity in the preliminary proceedings was set up in the case of Lee County v. RogersSearch
-
chancellor gave the history and grounds of the general doctrine of lis pendens in 1815, in the case of Murray v. BallouSearch
-
case related to land, with regard to which the doctrine is uniformly applied. In the subsequent case of Murray v. LylburnSearch
-
cases have only carried it out and applied it. We shall cite only a few of the most important. In Kieffer v. EhlerSearch
-
that of injunction and sequestration by a court of chancery. In a subsequent case in Pennsylvania, that of Diamond v. LawrenceSearch
-
on the ground that, in Pennsylvania, such bonds are not deemed negotiable securities. The case of Winston v. WestfeldtSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
forbear to accumulate further quotations. Suffice it to say that the same doctrine is held and adjudged in Stone v. ElliottSearch
-
Mims v. WestSearch
-
Durant v. IowaSearch
-
and Leitch v. WellsSearch
-
N.Y. 585, overruling same case in 48 Barb. 637. The case of Page 97 U. S. 108 Durant v. IowaSearch
-
Both are within the same mischief and the same reason. This very question was involved in City of Lexington v. ButlerSearch
-
Mr. Justice Miller, Mr. Justice Field, and Mr. Justice Harlan Dissented. Note -- in County of Warren V. PostSearch
-
and County of Warren v. PortsmouthSearch
-
These cases are in all respects similar to that of County of Warren v. MarcySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court County of Warren v. MarcySearch
-
Harding v. RockfordSearch
-
of Lee County v. RogersSearch
-
of Murray v. BallouSearch
-
of Murray v. LylburnSearch
-
In Kieffer v. EhlerSearch
-
of Diamond v. LawrenceSearch
-
of Winston v. WestfeldtSearch
-
Stone v. ElliottSearch
-
In County of Warren v. PostSearch
-
of County of Warren v. MarcySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial