Citation network
Mclean Vs. Fleming
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1877
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 245 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court McLean v. FlemingSearch
-
U.S. 245 (1877) McLean v. FlemingSearch
-
might be depriving him of the profit he might make by the sale of the goods which the purchaser intended to buy. Seixo v. ProvezendeSearch
-
the duty of the court to deny the prayer of the bill of complaint for an account of past gains and profits. Harrison v. TaylorSearch
-
him of his trade or customers by using such labels, signs, or trademark without his knowledge or consent. Coats v. HolbookSearch
-
Partridge v. MenckSearch
-
such a party is not, in general, entitled to the exclusive use of a name, merely as such, without more. Millington v. FoxSearch
-
Dent v. TurpinSearch
-
Meneely v. MeneelySearch
-
to the protection of a court of equity, to prevent others from infringing the proprietor's exclusive right. Gilman v. HunnewellSearch
-
Colladay v. BairdSearch
-
Sykes v. SykesSearch
-
Croft v. DaySearch
-
Burgess v. BurgessSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Holloway v. HollowaySearch
-
Rogers and Others v. TaintorSearch
-
protection if he takes seasonable measures to assert his rights and to prevent their continued invasion. James v. JamesSearch
-
Singleton v. BoltonSearch
-
Morrison v. SalmonSearch
-
Boardman v. MeridenSearch
-
even though he is not the manufacturer, and the name of the real manufacturer is used as part of the device. Walton v. CrowleySearch
-
Emerson v. BadgerSearch
-
even though the delay may be such as to preclude the party from any right to an account for past profits. Rodgers v. RodgersSearch
-
Blackwell v. CrabbSearch
-
the unwarranted use of the trademark, to sell a simulated article as and for the one which is genuine. Wotherspoon v. CurrieSearch
-
his goods as the goods of the complainant and that he persists in so doing after being requested to desist. Woollam v. RatcliffSearch
-
it is affixed, or to give notice to the public who is the producer, or where it may be purchased. Canal Company v. ClarkSearch
-
Taylor v. CarpenterSearch
-
to give the injured party a right to redress, if he has been guilty of no laches. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. SpearSearch
-
McAndrew v. BassettSearch
-
other indiciae of another, by which he may pass off his own goods to purchasers as the manufacture of another. Croft v. DaySearch
-
Perry v. TruefittSearch
-
Newman v. AlfordSearch
-
deceive the unwary and all others who purchase the article without opening the box and examining the label. Caswell v. DavisSearch
-
as such a purchaser usually gives, and to cause him to purchase the one supposing it to be the other. Gorham Company v. WhiteSearch
-
is of the opinion that the question presented in the second assignment of error is open for reexamination. Sullivan v. PortlandSearch
-
rights, even when the facts proved render it proper to grant an injunction to prevent future infringement. Harrison v. TaylorSearch
-
injunction is acknowledged because of an infringement, as in case of acquiescence or want of fraudulent intent. Moet v. CoustonSearch
-
Edelsten v. EdelstenSearch
-
Millington v. FoxSearch
-
Page 96 U. S. 258 Myeth v. StoneSearch
-
Beard v. TurnerSearch
-
Estcourt v. EstcourtSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McLean v. FlemingSearch
-
Seixo v. ProvezendeSearch
-
Harrison v. TaylorSearch
-
Coats v. HolbookSearch
-
Gilman v. HunnewellSearch
-
James v. JamesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial