Citation network
Hall Vs. Decuir
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1877
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 485 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Hall v. DeCuirSearch
-
U.S. 485 (1877) Hall v. DeCuirSearch
-
State Tax on Railway Gross Receipts, 15 Wall. 284. Thus, in Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
the charges of public warehouses, Page 95 U. S. 488 and in Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. IowaSearch
-
of dams and bridges across navigable streams situate entirely within their respective jurisdictions. Willson v. BlackbirdSearch
-
comes within the state. It has also been held that health and inspection laws may be passed by the states, Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
may permit the states to regulate pilots and pilotage until it shall itself legislate upon the subject, Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
to adapt such laws to new developments of trade. As was said by MR. JUSTICE FIELD, speaking for the Court in Welton v. StateSearch
-
employed in conveying passengers as well as to those engaged in transporting goods and merchandise. Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
as the instruments of intercourse and trade as well as the officers and seamen employed in their navigation. People v. BrooksSearch
-
United States, entitled to the privileges of ships and vessels employed in the coasting trade or fisheries. Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
marine to pursue the coasting trade without being subjected to burdensome and inconsistent state regulations. Welton v. StateSearch
-
of regulation, may justly be said to be of such a nature as to require exclusive legislation by Congress. Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
whether with foreign nations or among the several states, must of necessity be national in its character. Henderson v. MayorSearch
-
equally well settled that Congress has, in many instances and to a wide extent, legislated upon the subject. Sherlock v. AllingSearch
-
and have never been supposed to be on that account withdrawn from the control or protection of Congress. Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
an intention to leave Page 95 U. S. 499 some particular matter to be regulated by the several states. Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
as to what it does not do is as expressive of what its intention is as the direct provisions made by it. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
completely taken from the state legislatures as if they had been expressly forbidden to exercise the power. Sturges v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Page 95 U. S. 500 facts of the case do bring the conduct of the defendant within that prohibition. DeCuir v. BensonSearch
-
Hart v. HossSearch
-
Sauvinet v. WalkerSearch
-
the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act, must be regarded as conclusive in this Court. Provident Institution v. MassachusettsSearch
-
that this Court can review the decision of the state court as to the validity of such a statute. Insurance Company v. TreasurerSearch
-
power of this Court of no avail in such cases to uphold the contract against unfriendly state legislation. Delmas v. InsuranceSearch
-
given to them by the highest court of the state, become the rule of decision in the federal courts. Richmond v. SmithSearch
-
Jones & Co. v. CitySearch
-
the proprietors so as to make their business less lucrative or their management less acceptable to the public. Jencks v. ColemanSearch
-
than denying him certain accommodations from which he was excluded by the rules and regulations of the steamer. Day v. OwenSearch
-
or possessors would be virtually stripped of all utility or value if bound to comply with the regulations. Jencks v. ColemanSearch
-
and suitable regulations as regards passengers intending to pass and repass in their vehicles or vessels. Commonwealth v. PowerSearch
-
Hibbard v. NewSearch
-
Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. WhittemoreSearch
-
he is bound to regulate his house so as to preserve order, and, if practicable, prevent breaches of the peace. Vinton v. MiddlesexSearch
-
where white and colored persons are huddled together without their consent. West Chester & Philadelphia Railroad Co. v. MilesSearch
-
is not prohibited by either the state or federal Constitution, nor would it contravene the provisions of either. State v. McCannSearch
-
founded on just grounds of reason and experience, and in the results of a discriminating and honest judgment. Roberts v. CitySearch
-
as they should deem best, whether based on age, sex, race, or any other reasonable existent condition. State v. DuffySearch
-
and it is impliedly conceded that it would be competent for the legislature again to confer that authority. Clark v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hall v. DeCuirSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial