Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Brown Vs. Spofford

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1877

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 5 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Collins Vs. Gilbert US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  2. Swift Vs. Tyson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1842
  3. Fowler Vs. Brantly US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1840
  4. Specht Vs. Howard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1872
  5. Andrews Vs. Pond US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1839
  6. U.S. 474 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. Spofford
    Search
  7. U.S. 474 (1877) Brown v. Spofford
    Search
  8. to overcome the effect of that evidence or to invalidate the title of the holder supported by that evidence. Goodman v. Harvey
    Search
  9. Goodman v. Simonds
    Search
  10. Noxon v. Dewolf
    Search
  11. Magee v. Badger
    Search
  12. drawer and the party in whose favor the bill was drawn was inadmissible to vary the terms of the instrument. Brown v. Wiley
    Search
  13. period, tended in a very material degree to alter and vary the operation and effect of the instrument. Shankland v. Washington
    Search
  14. Stackpole v. Arnold
    Search
  15. Hunt v. Adams
    Search
  16. Myrick v. Dame
    Search
  17. Thompson v. Ketchum
    Search
  18. the amount, even though the instrument, as between the antecedent parties, is without any legal validity. Goodman v. Simonds
    Search
  19. was brought here on writ of error, reversed the judgment, holding that the evidence should have been excluded. Banks v. Dunn
    Search
  20. be admitted to vary, qualify, contradict, add to, or subtract from the absolute terms of a written contract. Specht v. Howard
    Search
  21. to vary, qualify, or contradict, or to add to or subtract from, the absolute terms of the written contract. Forsyth v. Kimball
    Search
  22. Abrey v. Crux
    Search
  23. Allan v. Furbish
    Search
  24. and must be determined by the court as matter of law, as has been held by this Court in several cases. Andrews v. Pond
    Search
  25. it be first shown that he had knowledge of such facts and circumstances at the time the transfer was made. Goodman v. Simonds
    Search
  26. Chitty, Contr. (10th ed.) 693. Agreements unperformed cannot be pleaded as accord and satisfaction. United States v. Clark
    Search
  27. failed to make the payment, it was held that the creditor might enforce the judgment for the full amount. Early v. Rogers
    Search
  28. the Court decided that the debt stood revived, and that judgment was properly rendered for the whole amount. Clark v. Brown
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. Spofford
    Search
  30. Goodman v. Harvey
    Search
  31. Shankland v. Washington
    Search
  32. Banks v. Dunn
    Search
  33. Forsyth v. Kimball
    Search
  34. United States v. Clark
    Search
  35. Early v. Rogers
    Search
  36. Clark v. Brown
    Search
  37. Brown v. Wiley
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial