Citation network
Good Vs. Martin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1877
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 90 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Good v. MartinSearch
-
U.S. 90 (1877) Good v. MartinSearch
-
endorser, even though it be true that the payee Page 95 U. S. 92 may never endorse the instrument. Phelps v. VischerSearch
-
Shafer v. Farmers'Search
-
payee can sustain that relation to the maker, or put the note in circulation as a negotiable instrument. Essex Company v. EdmundsSearch
-
Moies v. BirdSearch
-
that he intended to give it credit by becoming liable to pay it either as guarantor or as an original promisor. Bryant v. EastmanSearch
-
Benthal v. JudkinsSearch
-
Colbun v. AverillSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the debt of a third person must be in writing, and there must be sufficient proof of the consideration. Brewster v. SilenceSearch
-
Leonard v. VredenburgSearch
-
Hall v. FarmerSearch
-
that if the endorsement is without date, it will be presumed to have been made at the inception of the note. Ranger v. CarySearch
-
Sylvester v. DownerSearch
-
Lewis v. HarveySearch
-
at a subsequent period, unless it was done in compliance with an agreement made before the note was executed. Hawkes v. PhillipsSearch
-
Leonard v. WilderSearch
-
Champion v. GriffithSearch
-
Ohio 228. Prior decisions of this Court are to the same effect, as appears by the following citation. Rey v. SimpsonSearch
-
or if he participated in the consideration of the note, he must be considered as a joint maker of the note. Schneider v. SchiffmanSearch
-
Irish v. CutlerSearch
-
took place at the time of the transaction are admissible to aid in the interpretation of the language employed. Denton v. PetersSearch
-
and giving the court the same advantages for construing the contract which were possessed by the actors. Cavazos v. TrevinoSearch
-
so to judge of the meaning of the words and of the correct application of the language to the things described. Shore v. WilsonSearch
-
Clayton v. GraysonSearch
-
that the evidence would have been admissible even if seasonable objection had been made to its competency. Hopkins v. LeekSearch
-
Hall v. CazenoveSearch
-
Cooper v. RobinsonSearch
-
blank endorsement of one not the payee, the presumption is that it was made at the inception of the instrument. Childs v. WymanSearch
-
parol proof, that it was not there when the note was delivered or that it was made at a subsequent date. Essex Company v. EdmundsSearch
-
but if it be attempted to charge the party as a guarantor, a distinct consideration must appear. Essex Company v. EdmundsSearch
-
Brewster v. SilenceSearch
-
not courts of the United States within the meaning of the Constitution, as appears by all the authorities. Clinton v. EnglebrechtSearch
-
Bowman v. NoyesSearch
-
Bailey v. KnappSearch
-
Halz v. SnyderSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Good v. MartinSearch
-
Phelps v. VischerSearch
-
Essex Company v. EdmundsSearch
-
Bryant v. EastmanSearch
-
Ranger v. CarySearch
-
Hawkes v. PhillipsSearch
-
Schneider v. SchiffmanSearch
-
Denton v. PetersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial