Citation network
Collins Vs. Gilbert
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1876
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 753 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Collins v. GilbertSearch
-
U.S. 753 (1876) Collins v. GilbertSearch
-
by endorsement or, when endorsed in blank or made payable to bearer, they are transferable by mere delivery. Goodman v. HarveySearch
-
Goodman v. SimondsSearch
-
Wheeler v. GuildSearch
-
Noxon v. DeWolfSearch
-
Mager v. BadgerSearch
-
Mills v. BarberSearch
-
same for value at its date, in the usual course of business, without notice of any thing to impeach his title. Bank v. LeightonSearch
-
Pettee v. ProutSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Way v. RichardsonSearch
-
fraudulent in its inception, or that it had been lost or stolen before it came to the possession of the holder. Uther v. RichSearch
-
Bailey v. BidwellSearch
-
Arbouin v. AndersonSearch
-
Bank v. FaganSearch
-
Fitch v. JonesSearch
-
Smith v. BraineSearch
-
Hall v. FeatherstoneSearch
-
that it was fraudulent in its inception or that it had been lost or stolen before it came to their possession. Swift v. TysonSearch
-
or not is in general a question of construction, and must be determined by the court as matter of law. Andrews v. PondSearch
-
Brown v. DavisSearch
-
Miller v. RaceSearch
-
Grant v. VaughanSearch
-
Peacock v. RhodesSearch
-
Lawson v. WestonSearch
-
use the same for his own benefit, then the holder, as against the acceptor or maker, is not entitled to recover. Gill v. CubittSearch
-
the tribunal where it was decided, and has not been considered an authority there for more than forty years. Goodman v. HarveySearch
-
charge, that the burden of proving good faith is all the burden which the law imposes on such a holder. Worcester Bank v. DorchesterSearch
-
Goodman v. HarveySearch
-
that to meet the inference so raised, fraud, felony, or some such matter must be proved. Smith v. SacSearch
-
to one who has no knowledge of those facts, his title is good, and he shall be entitled to receive the amount. Wheeler v. GuildSearch
-
holds it for value until the contrary appears, and the burden of proof is on the party impeaching his title. Collins v. MartinSearch
-
Bank v. HogeSearch
-
Phelan v. MossSearch
-
Raphael v. BankSearch
-
man upon inquiry in relation thereto are not sufficient to constitute a defense to a suit by the holder. Lake v. ReedSearch
-
Gage v. SharpSearch
-
it is incumbent on him to show that the endorsement was in fact made after the instrument was overdue. Ranger v. CarySearch
-
that unless the plaintiff gives satisfactory evidence that he gave value for the same, the defense will prevail. Fitch v. JonesSearch
-
Harvey v. TowersSearch
-
by the defendant will cast on the plaintiff the onus of showing that he gave value for the bill or note. Hall v. FeatherstoneSearch
-
that the holder did give value for it, because that was the very object for which the instrument was given. Percival v. FramptonSearch
-
Seybel v. BankSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Collins v. GilbertSearch
-
Bank v. LeightonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial