Citation network
County of Scotland Vs. Thomas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1876
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 682 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court County of Scotland v. ThomasSearch
-
U.S. 682 (1876) County of Scotland v. ThomasSearch
-
by the court was the act of the county, and binding upon it, and that the bonds so issued are valid. 3. Harshman v. BatesSearch
-
time to come. This has been settled by the Supreme Court of Missouri in several well considered decisions. See State v. SullivanSearch
-
State v. GreeneSearch
-
The same view was taken by this Court in the recent case of County of Callaway v. FosterSearch
-
U. S. 567 . See also state v. MaysvilleSearch
-
the counties to subscribe, or the privilege of the company to receive subscriptions, was decided in the case of State v. GreeneSearch
-
Wilmington Railroad Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
How. 376, and Tomlinson v. BranchSearch
-
of the company untouched thereby, nor a power to subscribe to its stock previously existing. See County of Callaway v. FosterSearch
-
county to subscribe to the stock should not continue in force. The decision of this Court in the case of Harshman v. BatesSearch
-
authorities. This is distinctly stated by the Supreme Court of Missouri in the case of Hannibal & St. Jo. Railroad Co. v. MarionSearch
-
Baltimore Railroad Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
Wall. 460, and recently reaffirmed in Branch v. CitySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of the North Missouri Railroad Company. It was expressly so held by the Supreme Court of Missouri in the case of Smith v. CountySearch
-
and the same principle had been adopted in the earlier case of Hannibal & St. Jo. Railroad Co. v. MarionSearch
-
id. 304. In Smith v. CountySearch
-
of each, as applicable to the several parts of the line. See also, to the same purport, the case of Hanna v. TheSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court County of Scotland v. ThomasSearch
-
Harshman v. BatesSearch
-
See State v. SullivanSearch
-
of County of Callaway v. FosterSearch
-
of State v. GreeneSearch
-
Philadelphia & Wilmington Railroad Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
and Tomlinson v. BranchSearch
-
See County of Callaway v. FosterSearch
-
of Harshman v. BatesSearch
-
of Hannibal & St. Jo. Railroad Co. v. MarionSearch
-
of the Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
Branch v. CitySearch
-
of Smith v. CountySearch
-
In Smith v. CountySearch
-
of Hanna v. TheSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial