Citation network
Cromwell Vs. County of Sac
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1876
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cromwell v. CountySearch
-
of Sac - 94 U.S. 351 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Cromwell v. CountySearch
-
of Sac, 94 U.S. 351 (1876) Cromwell v. CountySearch
-
mentioned is seen through all the leading adjudications upon the doctrine of estoppel. Thus, in the case of Outram v. MorewoodSearch
-
And in the Page 94 U. S. 354 case of Gardner v. BuckbeeSearch
-
upon the theory that, if not thus involved, the judgment would be inoperative as an estoppel. In the case of Miles v. CaldwellSearch
-
instances. It was so adjudged by this Court in the case of Washington, Alexandria & Georgetown Steam Packet Co. v. SicklesSearch
-
that a judgment by default in such a case would make the several statements evidence in any other proceeding. Boyleau v. RutlinSearch
-
Hughes v. AlexanderSearch
-
Duer 493. The case of Howlett v. TarteSearch
-
The language of the Vice-Chancellor, in the case of Henderson v. HendersonSearch
-
of business and for value, and without notice of any equities between the prior parties to the instrument. Goodman v. HarveySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Goodman v. SimondsSearch
-
Ranger v. CarySearch
-
suit may be maintained on them without the necessity of producing the bonds to which they were attached. Knox County v. AspinwallSearch
-
White v. RailroadSearch
-
Aurora v. WestSearch
-
and original payee, nor to the setoff of any debt, legal or equitable, which the latter may owe to the former. Pettee v. ProutSearch
-
gave value for the instrument in the usual course of business, in which event he is still entitled to recover. Fitch v. JonesSearch
-
Smith v. BraineSearch
-
Hall v. FeatherstoneSearch
-
second suit is different, provided the second suit involves the same title and depends upon the same question. Outram v. MorewoodSearch
-
and a final judgment deciding the right must put an end to the dispute, else the litigation would be endless. Rex v. KingstonSearch
-
Kitchen v. CampbellSearch
-
Ricardo v. GarciasSearch
-
merits of the cause as disclosed in the second declaration were not heard and decided in the first action. Gilman v. RivesSearch
-
Richardson v. BartonSearch
-
and the former judgment Page 94 U. S. 365 in such a case is conclusive between the parties. Outram v. MorewoodSearch
-
Greathead v. BroomleySearch
-
litigation, and which the parties, exercising reasonable diligence, might have brought forward at the time. Henderson v. HendersonSearch
-
Bagot v. WilliamsSearch
-
Roberts v. HeineSearch
-
Safford v. ClarkSearch
-
Miller v. CovertSearch
-
to all facts involved in it, as necessary steps, or the groundwork upon which it must have been founded. Burlen v. ShannonSearch
-
Queen v. HartingtonSearch
-
Gilbert v. ThompsonSearch
-
made by this Court nearly twenty years ago, by a judge very competent to perform that duty. Steam Packet Company v. SicklesSearch
-
was conclusive that the sale was fraudulent, and that the plaintiff could not recover in the second action. Gardner v. BuckbeeSearch
-
bonds were given at the same time upon the same consideration, and as part of one and the same transaction. Bouchard v. DiasSearch
-
in the two preceding cases were for the same cause of action as the first, but the defense was sustained as in Outram v. MorewoodSearch
-
Burt v. SternburghSearch
-
Whittaker v. JacksonSearch
-
Strutt v. BovingdonSearch
-
the issue on which it is founded, and is conclusive only so far as the same fact or title is again in dispute. Merriam v. WhittemoreSearch
-
questions not involved in the issue, and which were neither open to inquiry nor the subjects of litigation. Norton v. HuxleySearch
-
his case upon the evidence introduced, he was bound to abide by the verdict and judgment in the first suit. Trask v. RailroadSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial