Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wiggins Vs. People

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1876

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

50 entries 50 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 465 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Wiggins v. People
    Search
  2. U.S. 465 (1876) Wiggins v. People
    Search
  3. Stokes v. People
    Search
  4. Keener v. State
    Search
  5. Campbell v. People
    Search
  6. Holler v. State
    Search
  7. People v. Arnold
    Search
  8. People v. Scroggins
    Search
  9. false, and that there was not in fact either design to do him serious injury, or danger that it would be done. Shorter v. People
    Search
  10. People v. McLeod
    Search
  11. same rule of decision, and it appears to be well founded in reason Page 93 U. S. 479 and justice. Patterson v. People
    Search
  12. People v. Sullivan
    Search
  13. State v. Sloan
    Search
  14. State v. Baker
    Search
  15. Com. v. Drum
    Search
  16. State v. Scott
    Search
  17. State v. Harris
    Search
  18. Dill v. State
    Search
  19. Dyson v. State
    Search
  20. Holmes v. State
    Search
  21. Carroll v. State
    Search
  22. to take the life of the deceased in order to save his own life, or to save himself from enormous bodily harm. Logue v. Com
    Search
  23. testimony, holding to the effect that the evidence was immaterial, as it constituted no defense to the accused. State v. Field
    Search
  24. relevant and material was the manner in which the deceased assaulted the defendant at the time of the homicide. Com. v. Mead
    Search
  25. it is necessary to deprive him of life in order to save his own or to prevent some felony upon his person. Prichett v. State
    Search
  26. Com. v. Hilliard
    Search
  27. not been communicated, unless the circumstances tend strongly to inculpate the deceased as the first aggressor. People v. Lamb
    Search
  28. Powell v. State
    Search
  29. Dupree v. State
    Search
  30. which reference will be made. Violent threats were made by the deceased against the prisoner in the case of Stokes v. People
    Search
  31. to justify the taking of the life of another have already been referred to, of which there are many more. State v. Collins
    Search
  32. Whart.Homicide 407. Pursuant to that rule, it was held in the case of Newcomb v. State
    Search
  33. no other way than to kill the supposed assailant, he was not obliged to wait until he was actually assailed. Bohammon v. Com
    Search
  34. the threatened purpose, the evidence of previous threats is not admitted by the Supreme Court of Arkansas. Atkins v. State
    Search
  35. Pitman v. State
    Search
  36. evidence to make out a case of self-defense, the Supreme Court of Indiana hold that the evidence is admissible. Holler v. State
    Search
  37. the previous threats manifests, at the time of the act, a design to carry the threats into immediate effect. People v. Scroggins
    Search
  38. U.S. Supreme Court Wiggins v. People
    Search
  39. Shorter v. People
    Search
  40. Patterson v. People
    Search
  41. Logue v. Com
    Search
  42. State v. Field
    Search
  43. Com. v. Mead
    Search
  44. Prichett v. State
    Search
  45. People v. Lamb
    Search
  46. of Stokes v. People
    Search
  47. State v. Collins
    Search
  48. of Newcomb v. State
    Search
  49. Bohammon v. Com
    Search
  50. the Supreme Court of Arkansas. Atkins v. State
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial