Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Ober Vs. Gallagher

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1876

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 5 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Shields Vs. Barrow US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1854
  2. inbusch Vs. Farwell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1861
  3. Jones Vs. Andrews US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1869
  4. Sheldon Vs. Sill US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  5. Batesville Institute Vs. Kauffman US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  6. U.S. 199 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Ober v. Gallagher
    Search
  7. U.S. 199 (1876) Ober v. Gallagher
    Search
  8. judicial power of the United States as defined by the Constitution. The decisions to this effect are numerous. Hagan v. Walker
    Search
  9. Clearwater Page 93 U. S. 205 v. Meredith
    Search
  10. Barnes v. Baltimore
    Search
  11. R. Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb
    Search
  12. Pet. 65. In Louisville Railroad Company v. Litson
    Search
  13. was passed exclusively with an intent to rid the courts of the decision in the case of Strawbridge v. Curtis
    Search
  14. Cranch 267, which, with that of Bank v. Deveaux
    Search
  15. in such court to recover such contents if no assignment had been made. Under this act, it was held, in Sheldon v. Sill
    Search
  16. upon the judgment in the courts of the United States in Tennessee. As was well said by Mr. Justice Story in Bean v. Smith
    Search
  17. mortgage, and such a security passes by an assignment of the debt it secures. We so held in Batesville Institute v. Kauffman
    Search
  18. assigned, we should be compelled to recognize it as a rule of property there, and be governed accordingly. Suydam v. Williamson
    Search
  19. But we do not understand such to have been the fact. The first case in which this ruling was made was Sheppard v. Thomas
    Search
  20. by a divided court, two out of the five judges dissenting. This case was followed also by a divided court in Jones v. Doss
    Search
  21. Laws, 1873, p. 217, sec. 28. This legislation was followed, at the December Term, 1873, by the case of Campbell v. Rankin
    Search
  22. the case, Page 93 U. S. 208 the circuit court was right in following our decision in Batesville Institute v. Kauffman
    Search
  23. especially as its decision was not made until after the doubts expressed in Campbell v. Rankin
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Ober v. Gallagher
    Search
  25. Hagan v. Walker
    Search
  26. Commercial & R. Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb
    Search
  27. In Louisville Railroad Company v. Litson
    Search
  28. of Strawbridge v. Curtis
    Search
  29. of Bank v. Deveaux
    Search
  30. Bean v. Smith
    Search
  31. Sheppard v. Thomas
    Search
  32. Jones v. Doss
    Search
  33. of Campbell v. Rankin
    Search
  34. Campbell v. Rankin
    Search
  35. Suydam v. Williamson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial