Citation network
ClaflIn Vs. Houseman
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1876
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 130 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Claflin v. HousemanSearch
-
U.S. 130 (1876) Claflin v. HousemanSearch
-
doubt on the subject, but it was finally settled at the last term of this Court in favor of the jurisdiction. Lathrop v. DrakeSearch
-
consideration had it not been already in effect decided by the Court. In the opinion of the Court in Lathrop v. DrakeSearch
-
but as the question was not directly involved in that case, it was more fully considered in Eyster v. GaffSearch
-
in error supposes, the proceedings in bankruptcy would ipso facto determine them. But on this subject, in Eyster v. GaffSearch
-
with the United States courts of actions and suits in which a bankrupt or his assignee is a party. See Samson v. BurtonSearch
-
Payson v. DietzSearch
-
Gilbert v. PriestSearch
-
Stevens v. Mechanics'Search
-
Cook v. WhippleSearch
-
Brown v. HallSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mays v. ManSearch
-
Nat. Bank, 64 Penn. 74. There are contrary cases, it is true, as Brigham v. ClaflinSearch
-
Wis. 607, Page 93 U. S. 135 Voorhees v. FrisbieSearch
-
It was held, in Bank v. DeveauxSearch
-
In the case of Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Wood v. JenkinsSearch
-
See remarks of MR. JUSTICE FIELD in The Moses Taylor, 4 Wall. 429, and Story, J., in Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
with the proper jurisdiction of the other, as was so clearly shown by Chief Justice Taney in the case of Ableman v. BoothSearch
-
Parsons v. BarnardSearch
-
Dudley v. MayhewSearch
-
Elmer v. PennelSearch
-
conferred upon them, but this does not militate against the weight of the general argument. See United States v. LathropSearch
-
It was indeed intimated by Mr. Justice Story, obiter dictum, in delivering the opinion of the Court in Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
limitations, and did not have much influence with the court when a proper case arose for its adjudication. Houston v. MooreSearch
-
the Court conceded that Congress had the power to make the jurisdiction of its own courts exclusive. In Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
The case of Teal v. FeltonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Claflin v. HousemanSearch
-
See Samson v. BurtonSearch
-
Brigham v. ClaflinSearch
-
Voorhees v. FrisbieSearch
-
Bank v. DeveauxSearch
-
of Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
of Ableman v. BoothSearch
-
See United States v. LathropSearch
-
In Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
of Teal v. FeltonSearch
-
Houston v. MooreSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial