Citation network
Town of Venice Vs. Murdock
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1875
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 494 (1875) U.S. Supreme Court Town of Venice v. MurdockSearch
-
U.S. 494 (1875) Town of Venice v. MurdockSearch
-
the condition precedent to the exercise of their authority to issue the bonds had been complied with. Commissioners v. NicholsSearch
-
Without citing the numerous decisions which sustain this statement of the law, we refer only to St. Joseph Township v. RogersSearch
-
Wall. 644, and Town of Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
that in the State of New York it has been held adversely to the opinions we have expressed. It was so held in Starin v. TownSearch
-
of Genoa and in Gould v. TownSearch
-
differing in some material particulars. These decisions are in conflict with the rulings of this Court in Bissell v. JeffersonvilleSearch
-
Knox County v. AspinwallSearch
-
Mercer County v. HackettSearch
-
other cases which we have cited. They are in conflict also with decisions in other state courts. Society for Savings v. NewSearch
-
Railroad Company v. EvansvilleSearch
-
Comm'rs v. NicholsSearch
-
of two-thirds of the resident taxables whether the supervisors and commissioners might act under the power. In Gould v. SterlingSearch
-
the legislative act required no affidavit to be filed with a statement of the assenting taxpayers, and in Starin v. GenoaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
it was wholly useless, for the assessment rolls of the township would have shown as much. The authority of Starin v. GenoaSearch
-
has not been increased by the subsequent action of the New York courts. In People v. MeadSearch
-
N.Y. 114, the ruling was followed, but Judge Denio, who only gave an opinion, claimed that the decision in Starin v. GenoaSearch
-
the ground that the bonds were not issued upon a loan, and that the plaintiff was not a bona fide holder. People v. MeadSearch
-
But assuming that what was ruled in Gould v. SterlingSearch
-
and in Starin v. GenoaSearch
-
denied in this Court, in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and even in the Court of Appeals of New York. People v. MeadSearch
-
Town of Venice v. WoodruffSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE MILLER, MR. JUSTICE DAVIS, and MR. JUSTICE FIELD, dissented. NOTE -- The cases of Town of Venice v. WoodruffSearch
-
Same v. WatsonSearch
-
Same v. EdsonSearch
-
Town of Venice v. MurdockSearch
-
delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases are, in all essential particulars, like the case of Town of Venice v. MurdockSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Town of Venice v. MurdockSearch
-
Commissioners v. NicholsSearch
-
St. Joseph Township v. RogersSearch
-
and Town of Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
Starin v. TownSearch
-
Gould v. TownSearch
-
Bissell v. JeffersonvilleSearch
-
Savings v. NewSearch
-
In Gould v. SterlingSearch
-
Starin v. GenoaSearch
-
of Starin v. GenoaSearch
-
In People v. MeadSearch
-
People v. MeadSearch
-
Gould v. SterlingSearch
-
the Court of Appeals of New York. People v. MeadSearch
-
of Town of Venice v. WoodruffSearch
-
of Town of Venice v. MurdockSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial