Citation network
Pollard Vs. Lyon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1875
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 225 (1875) U.S. Supreme Court Pollard v. LyonSearch
-
U.S. 225 (1875) Pollard v. LyonSearch
-
and published which would not be actionable if merely spoken, without averring and proving special damage. Clement v. ChivisSearch
-
McClurg v. RossSearch
-
Ogden v. TurnerSearch
-
Somewhat different phraseology is employed by the court in the next case to which reference will be made. Onslow v. HorneSearch
-
otherwise they are not actionable. Holt v. ScholefieldSearch
-
words which do not impute a crime, however expressed, can ever be made actionable by a colloquium or innuendo. Colman v. GodwinSearch
-
Woolnoth v. MeadowsSearch
-
ever since been followed in that state, and has been very extensively adopted in the courts of other states. Brooker v. CoffinSearch
-
of the court, he had occasion to give his reasons somewhat more fully for the conclusion then expressed. Van Ness v. HamiltonSearch
-
punishment, then the words will be in themselves actionable. Attempt was made by counsel in the case of Widrig v. OyerSearch
-
to adopt the suggestion, and repeated and followed the rule in another case reported in the same volume. Martin v. StillwellSearch
-
id. 275. See also Gibbs v. DeweySearch
-
Alexander v. DeweySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Young v. MillerSearch
-
in the reported decisions of the courts of that state, of which one or two more only will be referred to. Bissell v. CornellSearch
-
but the supreme court of the state refused so to hold. Widrig v. OyerSearch
-
Wright v. PageSearch
-
uttered language the effect of which was to charge the plaintiff with some crime or offense punishable by law. Dunnell v. FiskeSearch
-
office, business, or trust which would probably be injuriously affected by the truth of such imputations. Chaddock v. BriggsSearch
-
Mass. 252. Special reference is made to the case of Miller v. ParishSearch
-
in correct. Exactly the same question was decided by the same court in the same way twenty-five years later. Kenney v. LaughlinSearch
-
but such decisions do not affect any question involved in this investigation. Vandcrip v. RoeSearch
-
Simons v. CarterSearch
-
that the party has suffered the penalty of the law, and is no longer exposed to the danger of punishment. Krebs v. OliverSearch
-
Fowler v. DowdneySearch
-
words broader than that which the words naturally bear, unless connected with proper introductory averments. Alexander v. AngleSearch
-
Goldstein v. FossSearch
-
Carter v. AndrewsSearch
-
Beardsley v. TappanSearch
-
ambiguous to the material subject matter properly on the record, by the way of averment or colloquium. Gosling v. MorganSearch
-
Shafter v. KinsterSearch
-
Andres v. KoppenheaferSearch
-
of an infamous character, or which is calculated to affect the party injuriously in his or her social standing. Buck v. HerseySearch
-
Mills v. WimpSearch
-
Perdue v. BurnettSearch
-
Demarest v. HaringSearch
-
Redway v. GraySearch
-
annotators of the American Leading Cases say that the supreme court of the State of New York, in the case of Brooker v. CoffinSearch
-
both criminally and by action, when the mere speaking of the words would not be punishable in either way. Villiers v. MouselySearch
-
Saville v. JardineSearch
-
Keiler v. SessfordSearch
-
Janson v. StuartSearch
-
of a very striking character are given, every one of which is supported by the authority of an adjudged case. Lumby v. AlldaySearch
-
Barnet v. AllenSearch
-
been all but seduced by a notorious libertine, was not actionable without averring and proving special damage. Lynch v. KnightSearch
-
is alleged, unless it is proved, and the proposition is fully sustained by the cases cited in its support. Welby v. ElstonSearch
-
and show that such is the rule of decision in all the courts of that country having jurisdiction in such cases. Heming v. PowerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Pollard v. LyonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial