Citation network
Mcphaul Vs. Lapsley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1873
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 264 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court McPhaul v. LapsleySearch
-
U.S. 20 Wall. 264 264 (1873) McPhaul v. LapsleySearch
-
months in the Act of 1836 just referred to. These acts are cited by the Supreme Court of Texas in Guilbeau v. MaysSearch
-
section, above cited, as descriptive of the instruments to be recorded, the Supreme Court of Texas, in Henderson v. PilgrimSearch
-
authority adequate to the function he performed, and that the testimonio was valid, was held by this Court in Spencer v. LapsleySearch
-
the testimonio in evidence, and it was properly received. It would have been admissible without recording. In Martin v. ParkerSearch
-
We do not think the objection well taken. In McKissick v. ColquhounSearch
-
to give secondary evidence where it presupposes better evidence within his reach, which he fails to produce. In Renner v. BankSearch
-
Secrest v. JonesSearch
-
Section 90. Referred to in Hanric v. BartonSearch
-
Section 90, Act 13th May, 1846, p. 387, referred to in Hanrick v. BartonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mitchel v. UnitedSearch
-
Herndon v. CasianoSearch
-
Guilbeau v. MaysSearch
-
Henderson v. PilgrimSearch
-
Paschal v. PerezSearch
-
Edwards v. JamesSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McPhaul v. LapsleySearch
-
In Martin v. ParkerSearch
-
In McKissick v. ColquhounSearch
-
In Renner v. BankSearch
-
Hanric v. BartonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial