Citation network
Nugent Vs. Supervisors
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1873
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 241 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court Nugent v. SupervisorsSearch
-
U.S. 19 Wall. 241 241 (1873) Nugent v. SupervisorsSearch
-
I feel compelled to say that I cannot find any line of distinction between this case and Marsh v. FultonSearch
-
In the case of Clearwater v. MeredithSearch
-
I cannot see any feature in this case which differs from Marsh v. FultonSearch
-
that no subscription was formally made upon the books of the company is quite immaterial. In Justices of Clarke County v. ParisSearch
-
effect of those made under legislation subsequent to the contract of subscription. In Cork & Youghal Railway Company v. PatersonSearch
-
his signature to the Cork & Waterford, and so make him a subscriber to that. To the same effect are the cases of Nixon v. BrownlowSearch
-
and Nixon v. GreenSearch
-
and not provided for or contemplated by either the charter itself or the general laws of the state. In Sparrow v. EvansvilleSearch
-
and this though the consolidation took place without his knowledge or consent. The same doctrine was asserted in Bish v. JohnsonSearch
-
The Supreme Court of Connecticut recognized the rule in Bishop v. BrainerdSearch
-
hand, but these are sufficient. Page 86 U. S. 252 No well considered cases are in conflict with them. Marsh v. FultonSearch
-
and the board of a supervisors in directing it, must not be considered as having consented. What was ruled in Marsh v. FultonSearch
-
County, therefore, does not touch this case. Nor was there anything decided in Clearwater v. MeredithSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See Clearwater v. MeredithSearch
-
Hanna v. CincinnatiSearch
-
Schenectady & Saratoga Plankroad Co. v. ThatcherSearch
-
Buffalo & New York City Railroad Co. v. DudleySearch
-
Meadow Dam v. GraySearch
-
Agricultural Branch Railroad Co. v. WinchesterSearch
-
Noyes v. SpauldingSearch
-
Pacific Railroad Co. v. RenshawSearch
-
Fry v. LexingtonSearch
-
Illinois River Railroad Co. v. BeersSearch
-
Terre Haute & Alton Railroad Co. v. EarpSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Nugent v. SupervisorsSearch
-
and Marsh v. FultonSearch
-
of Clearwater v. MeredithSearch
-
Marsh v. FultonSearch
-
In Justices of Clarke County v. ParisSearch
-
In Cork & Youghal Railway Company v. PatersonSearch
-
of Nixon v. BrownlowSearch
-
In Sparrow v. EvansvilleSearch
-
Bish v. JohnsonSearch
-
Bishop v. BrainerdSearch
-
Hanna v. CincinnatiSearch
-
Schenectady & Saratoga Plankroad Co. v. ThatcherSearch
-
Clearwater v. MeredithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial