Citation network
Olcott Vs. the Supervisors
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1872
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Olcott v. TheSearch
-
Supervisors - 83 U.S. 678 (1872) U.S. Supreme Court Olcott v. TheSearch
-
Supervisors, 83 U.S. 16 Wall. 678 678 (1872) Olcott v. TheSearch
-
in the court below, the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin, in the Page 83 U. S. 680 case of Whiting v. FondSearch
-
to authorize it to be raised, by taxation, for the purpose of donating it to a private corporation. We held, in Curtis v. WhippleSearch
-
essentially a private corporation, coming fully within the operation of the principles laid down in Curtis v. WhippleSearch
-
the supreme court of the state has decided the act was unauthorized by the constitution. It was thus ruled in Whiting v. FondSearch
-
the constitution or statutes of a state, which the federal courts adopt as rules for their own judgments. That Whiting v. FondSearch
-
law, no state court can conclusively determine for us. This consideration alone satisfies our minds that Whiting v. FondSearch
-
are formed. Nothing can justify us in holding them to any other rule. If, then, the doctrine asserted in Whiting v. FondSearch
-
the power of the legislature to delegate to such a company the state right of eminent domain was justified. In Pratt v. BrownSearch
-
companies is taken for the public use. Similar language was used and a decision to the same effect was made in Robbins v. RailroadSearch
-
In Hasbrouck v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
So also in Soens v. RacineSearch
-
directly promoted, but whether those of the whole or the greater part of the community will be. And again, in Brodhead v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
certainly not until the case of Whiting v. FondSearch
-
We have, however, considered this subject in the case of the Railroad Co. v. CountySearch
-
Havemeyer v. IowaSearch
-
Gelpcke v. CitySearch
-
Trust Company v. DeboltSearch
-
Clark v. JanesvilleSearch
-
and Bushnell v. BeloitSearch
-
Beekman v. SaratogaSearch
-
Bloodgood v. MohawkSearch
-
Worcester v. RailroadSearch
-
Charles River Bridge Co. v. WarrenSearch
-
Clark v. JanesvilleSearch
-
Bushnell v. BeloitSearch
-
Gibbons v. MobileSearch
-
Davidson v. CommissionersSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Olcott v. TheSearch
-
of Whiting v. FondSearch
-
Curtis v. WhippleSearch
-
Whiting v. FondSearch
-
That Whiting v. FondSearch
-
In Pratt v. BrownSearch
-
Robbins v. RailroadSearch
-
Soens v. RacineSearch
-
Brodhead v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
of the Railroad Co. v. CountySearch
-
Ohio Life & Trust Company v. DeboltSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial