Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

New Buffalo Vs. Iron Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 26, 1870

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 7 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. Town of Queensbury Vs. Culver US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  2. County of Scotland Vs. Thomas US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  3. Town of East Lincoln Vs. Davenport US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  4. Wilson Vs. Salamanca US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  5. Empire Vs. Darlington US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  6. Menasha Vs. Hazard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  7. Harter Vs. Kernochan US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  8. New Buffalo v. Iron
    Search
  9. Co. - 105 U.S. 73 (1870) U.S. Supreme Court New Buffalo v. Iron
    Search
  10. Co., 105 U.S. 73 (1881) New Buffalo v. Iron
    Search
  11. To the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan Syllabus 1. Taylor V. Ypsilanti
    Search
  12. its road. Sess.Laws Mich. 1869, p. 89. It is the same statute whose validity and construction were involved in Taylor v. Ypsilanti
    Search
  13. as it existed when the bonds were issued, they were void. In support of that position we are referred to People v. Salem
    Search
  14. Bay City v. State
    Search
  15. Treasurer, 23 Mich. 499, and Thomas v. Port
    Search
  16. Huron, 27 Mich. 320. This question was fully considered in Taylor v. Ypsilanti
    Search
  17. by its Supreme Court and acted upon by its legislature and executive departments prior to the decision in People v. Salem
    Search
  18. time the defendant in error in fact received the bonds. The defendant in error is a holder for value. Railroad Company v. National
    Search
  19. by virtue of its contract with the township. That contract was made and fully performed before the decision in People v. Salem
    Search
  20. Nor is it a material circumstance that this was a donation, and not a subscription of stock. In Railroad Company v. County
    Search
  21. Olcott v. The
    Search
  22. the consolidated company with the powers, rights, property, and franchises of the constituent companies. Nugent v. The
    Search
  23. County of Tipton v. Locomotive
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court New Buffalo v. Iron
    Search
  25. Taylor v. Ypsilanti
    Search
  26. People v. Salem
    Search
  27. and Thomas v. Port
    Search
  28. Railroad Company v. National
    Search
  29. In Railroad Company v. County
    Search
  30. Nugent v. The
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial