Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mason Vs. Eldred

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1867

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 3 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Young Vs. Black US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1813
  2. D'Arcy Vs. Ketchum US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  3. Sheehy Vs. Mandeville US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1812
  4. U.S. 231 (1867) U.S. Supreme Court Mason v. Eldred
    Search
  5. U.S. 6 Wall. 231 231 (1867) Mason v. Eldred
    Search
  6. bars an action against the others, and that the entire cause of action is merged in the judgment. The case of Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  7. contract of each co-partner. The language of Lord Mansfield in giving the judgment of the King's Bench in Rice v. Shute
    Search
  8. constitute a bar to a suit upon the same note against another co-partner, the plaintiff relies upon the case of Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  9. tribunals of different states. It was elaborately reviewed by the supreme court of New York in the case of Robertson v. Smith
    Search
  10. direct conflict with its adjudication. In the Supreme Court of Massachusetts a ruling similar to that of Robinson v. Smith
    Search
  11. In Wann v. McNulty
    Search
  12. Page 73 U. S. 237 the Supreme Court of Illinois commented upon the case of Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  13. and Indiana -- was more consistent with the principles of law, and was supported by better reasons. In Smith v. Black
    Search
  14. In its opinion, the court referred to Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  15. who composed the Supreme Court of the United States, was not of binding authority, and it was disregarded. In King v. Hoar
    Search
  16. judicatam, and could not be made the subject of another action. In the course of the argument, the case of Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  17. the reasoning attributed to him in the report of that case was not satisfactory. Mr. Justice Story in Trafton v. United
    Search
  18. refers to this case in the Exchequer and to that of Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  19. the common law rule were to govern the decision of this case, we should feel obliged, notwithstanding Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  20. before the court, if found within the state, that such parties may be sued upon the original demand. In Bonesteel v. Todd
    Search
  21. In Oakley v. Aspinwall
    Search
  22. Young v. Rummell
    Search
  23. Ward v. Johnson
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Mason v. Eldred
    Search
  25. of Sheehy v. Mandeville
    Search
  26. Rice v. Shute
    Search
  27. of Robertson v. Smith
    Search
  28. of Robinson v. Smith
    Search
  29. In Smith v. Black
    Search
  30. In King v. Hoar
    Search
  31. Trafton v. United
    Search
  32. In Bonesteel v. Todd
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial