Citation network
BaldwIn Vs. Hale
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1863
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 223 (1863) U.S. Supreme Court Baldwin v. HaleSearch
-
U.S. 1 Wall. 223 223 (1863) Baldwin v. HaleSearch
-
inter alios, and wholly insufficient to support the defense. Adopting the views of the court in Scribner v. FisherSearch
-
be so framed that it does not impair the obligation of contracts. Such was the decision of this Court in Sturges v. CrowninshieldSearch
-
of the Constitution of the United States. Suggestion is made that the ruling of the court in the case of McMillan v. McNeillSearch
-
Eight years later, the question, in all its phases, was again presented to this Court in the case of Ogden v. SaundersSearch
-
of the Court, independently of what appears in the published report of the case. When the subsequent case of Boyle v. ZacharieSearch
-
session, and in the course of the opinion he repeated the explanations previously given by the Chief Justice. Boyle v. ZacharieSearch
-
to the same effect were also made by the present CHIEF JUSTICE in the case of Page 68 U. S. 231 Cook v. MoffatSearch
-
answer has uniformly been that the question depended upon citizenship. Such were the views of the court in Suydam v. BroadnaxSearch
-
and such a law is operative and binding upon the citizens of the state, but we repeat what the court said in Cook v. MoffatSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Judge Story says, in the case of Springer v. FosterSearch
-
made in the state, except such contracts as are made between citizens of that state. He refers to the case of Ogden v. SaundersSearch
-
the proposition, and remarks, without qualification, that the doctrine of that case was subsequently affirmed in Boyle v. ZacharieSearch
-
citizen of the state. Repeated decisions have been made in that court, which seem to support the same doctrine. Savoye v. MarshSearch
-
Braynard v. MarshallSearch
-
Pick. 196. But a majority of the court held, in Scribner v. FisherSearch
-
no man shall be condemned in his person or property without notice and an opportunity to make his defense. Nations v. JohnsonSearch
-
Oakley v. AspinwallSearch
-
state would have no power to require the citizens of other states to become parties to any such proceeding. Suydam v. BroadnaxSearch
-
and so are most of the decisions of the state courts. Donnelly v. CorbettSearch
-
Poe v. DuckSearch
-
Anderson v. WheelerSearch
-
Felch v. BugbeeSearch
-
Demerrit v. ExchangeSearch
-
Woodhull v. WagnerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Baldwin v. HaleSearch
-
Scribner v. FisherSearch
-
of McMillan v. McNeillSearch
-
of Ogden v. SaundersSearch
-
of Boyle v. ZacharieSearch
-
the Chief Justice. Boyle v. ZacharieSearch
-
of Springer v. FosterSearch
-
Savoye v. MarshSearch
-
Nations v. JohnsonSearch
-
Donnelly v. CorbettSearch
-
Boyle v. ZacharieSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial