Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Castillero

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1862

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

42 entries 1 linked 41 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Osio US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  2. U.S. 17 (1862) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Castillero
    Search
  3. U.S. 2 Black 17 17 (1862) United States v. Castillero
    Search
  4. under them is a manifest error which this Court cannot be expected to sanction. 6. The case of United States v. Castillero
    Search
  5. to the supreme government, and the laws for the disposition of the same emanated from that source. United States v. Knight
    Search
  6. Attempt is made to support the proposition by some of the remarks of this Court in the case of United States v. Castillero
    Search
  7. of justice also have had occasion to assert the same general principles. Plaintiff in ejectment was allowed, in Turner v. Reynolds
    Search
  8. the tract of land, but of the coal which was unsevered. Coal and minerals in place are land, say the court in Caldwell v. Fulton
    Search
  9. should be in one and the mineral in another, and we have no doubt that the rule there laid down is correct. Comyn v. Wheatley
    Search
  10. his acts he must exercise it in the manner required by law, and not having done so, his acts are void. United States v. Osio
    Search
  11. mines do not lie in grant, but pass like other Page 67 U. S. 220 hereditaments by livery of seizin. Chetham v. Williamson
    Search
  12. Bainbridge on Mines 3, 55, 124, 141, 170. In Stoughton v. Leigh
    Search
  13. landed estates, as the mines and strata of lead, or lead ore and coal, in the lands of other persons. In Wilkinson v. Proud
    Search
  14. Strange 1142. The case of The Queen v. The
    Search
  15. Beekman v. Saratoga
    Search
  16. of ores in the English law, and was land in the strictest and fullest sense of the term. The case of Fremont v. The
    Search
  17. A similar decision of the point presented for determination had already been made by the Supreme Court in Delassus v. The
    Search
  18. United States, the courts must always adopt the construction given to the treaty by the Political department, Elam v. Neilson
    Search
  19. conformably to the laws on colonization. The case thus resembles in some respects that of United States v. Lecompte
    Search
  20. legal effect -- and here we are fortunately not without authority to guide us. In the case of Andres Castillero v. The
    Search
  21. than that of the executive, whose assent to the grant was all that was required. In the case of United States v. Arguello
    Search
  22. which a court of equity cannot disregard, has been expressly decided by the Supreme Court. In the case of Fremont v. the
    Search
  23. for the United States. The same point had been raised and fully considered by the Court in the case of Palmer v. United
    Search
  24. brought within the scope of the war, and must be so regarded by the courts. To this point, the case of Harcourt v. Gaillard
    Search
  25. recognized -- nor could it constitutionally have been. It is observed by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TANEY, in Fleming v. Page
    Search
  26. for the purpose, though the event may demonstrate the conquest to have been practicable. The case of Harcourt v. Gaillard
    Search
  27. doctrine contended for by them. The distinction between that case and the case at bar is obvious. In Harcourt v. Gaillard
    Search
  28. derive no support from the case referred to. It is proper, however, to observe that the case of Harcourt v. Gaillard
    Search
  29. argument, for we have an authoritative decision of the Supreme Court on the point. In the case of United States v. Pico
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Castillero
    Search
  31. of United States v. Castillero
    Search
  32. Turner v. Reynolds
    Search
  33. Caldwell v. Fulton
    Search
  34. Comyn v. Wheatley
    Search
  35. Chetham v. Williamson
    Search
  36. In Stoughton v. Leigh
    Search
  37. In Wilkinson v. Proud
    Search
  38. of The Queen v. The
    Search
  39. of Fremont v. The
    Search
  40. Delassus v. The
    Search
  41. United States v. Arredondo
    Search
  42. United States v. Knight
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial