Citation network
Castle Vs. Bullard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1859
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 172 (1859) U.S. Supreme Court Castle v. BullardSearch
-
U.S. 23 How. 172 172 (1859) Castle v. BullardSearch
-
to grant a peremptory nonsuit against the will of the plaintiff. It was expressly so held by this Court in Elmore v. GrymesSearch
-
Pet. 471, and the same rule was also affirmed in De Wolf v. RabaudSearch
-
have been made to the same effect, and as long ago as 1832 it was declared, as the opinion of this Court in Crane v. LesseesSearch
-
of Morris, 6 Pet. 609, that this point was no longer open for controversy. See also Silsby v. FooteSearch
-
law, even in jurisdictions where the authority to grant the motion in a proper case is acknowledged to exist. Revett v. BrownSearch
-
Brown v. HowardSearch
-
is given, he is entitled instantly to be acquitted, and it must be admitted that the decision of the court in Childs v. ChamberlainSearch
-
C. & P. 213, favors that view of the law. But Lord Denman held in Sowell v. ChampionSearch
-
follow. Some courts hold that the application in all cases is addressed to the discretion of the court. Brotherton v. LivingstonSearch
-
as a matter of right, and that a refusal to grant the application is the proper subject of exceptions. Van Dusen v. VanSearch
-
Bates v. ConklinSearch
-
not to be granted unless it appear that there is no evidence to affect the party in whose favor it is made. Brown v. HowardSearch
-
as tending to show the intent of the actor in respect to the matters immediately involved in the issue on trial. Cary v. HoatlingSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Irving v. MotlySearch
-
Rowley v. BigelowSearch
-
Nicoll v. GlennieSearch
-
Selw. 568. In precise accordance with this view of the law, it was said, and well said, by the court in Olmsted v. HoatlingSearch
-
transacting the business. Where one assuming to be an agent had committed a fraud in a sale, it was held in Taylor v. GreenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Castle v. BullardSearch
-
Elmore v. GrymesSearch
-
De Wolf v. RabaudSearch
-
Crane v. LesseesSearch
-
Revett v. BrownSearch
-
Childs v. ChamberlainSearch
-
Sowell v. ChampionSearch
-
Brotherton v. LivingstonSearch
-
Van Dusen v. VanSearch
-
Cary v. HoatlingSearch
-
Olmsted v. HoatlingSearch
-
Taylor v. GreenSearch
-
Silsby v. FooteSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial