Citation network
Teese Vs. Huntingdon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1859
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 2 (1859) U.S. Supreme Court Teese v. HuntingdonSearch
-
U.S. 23 How. 2 2 (1859) Teese v. HuntingdonSearch
-
court may render judgment for a larger sum, not exceeding three times the amount of the verdict. 5 Stat. 123. Day v. WoodworthSearch
-
he relies to disprove the novelty of the invention, and the place or places where the same had been used. Wilton v. RailroadsSearch
-
Phillips v. KingfieldSearch
-
Goss v. StimpsonSearch
-
Wood v. MannSearch
-
Craig v. StateSearch
-
Gilbert v. SheldonSearch
-
Jackson v. LewisSearch
-
United States v. VanSearch
-
State v. BruceSearch
-
Com. v. MorseSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Gilchrist v. McKeeSearch
-
State v. SmithSearch
-
Frye v. BankSearch
-
Jones v. StateSearch
-
State v. RandolphSearch
-
Uhl v. ComSearch
-
Wike v. LightnerSearch
-
Kemmel v. KemmelSearch
-
State v. HowardSearch
-
Buckner v. StateSearch
-
Thurman v. VirginSearch
-
Perkins v. NobleySearch
-
Bates v. BarberSearch
-
he refers to several decided cases, both English and American, which appear to sustain the views of the writer. Rees v. WatsonSearch
-
Mawson v. HartsinkSearch
-
Rex v. RockwoodSearch
-
Carpenter v. WallSearch
-
Hume v. ScottSearch
-
Day v. StateSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Teese v. HuntingdonSearch
-
Wilton v. RailroadsSearch
-
Rees v. WatsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial