Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Barreda Vs. Silsbee

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1858

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 3 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Eliason US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1842
  2. Phillips Vs. Preston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1847
  3. United States Vs. Gooding US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1827
  4. U.S. 146 (1858) U.S. Supreme Court Barreda v. Silsbee
    Search
  5. U.S. 21 How. 146 146 (1858) Barreda v. Silsbee
    Search
  6. be gathered from the language employed, the surrounding circumstances, and the subject matter. The case of Gether v. Capper
    Search
  7. employed, the surrounding circumstances, and the subject matter. Our attention has been drawn to the case of Gether v. Capper
    Search
  8. done and made by the principal himself. That principle was directly sanctioned by this Court in United States v. Gooding
    Search
  9. American Fur Co. v. United
    Search
  10. by an appellate court, for some error of law which intervened in the proceedings. Page 62 U. S. 167 Parsons v. Bedford
    Search
  11. United States v. King
    Search
  12. Richardson v. Doane
    Search
  13. the inferences of fact to be drawn from it must be left to the jury. It was so held by this Court, in Etting v. Bank
    Search
  14. Other cases have been decided by this Court, applying the same doctrine as in Iasigi v. Brown
    Search
  15. not to be precluded from proving the truth, however contradictory to the written instruments of others. In Krider v. Lafferty
    Search
  16. and not to strangers. It is also held in England, in several cases, that the rule is not applicable to strangers. King v. Inhabitants
    Search
  17. Wilson v. Hart
    Search
  18. Overseers of Berlin v. Norwich
    Search
  19. Reynolds v. Magness
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Barreda v. Silsbee
    Search
  21. of Gether v. Capper
    Search
  22. American Fur Co. v. United
    Search
  23. Parsons v. Bedford
    Search
  24. Etting v. Bank
    Search
  25. Iasigi v. Brown
    Search
  26. In Krider v. Lafferty
    Search
  27. King v. Inhabitants
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial