Citation network
Spencer Vs. Lapsley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1857
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 264 (1857) U.S. Supreme Court Spencer v. LapsleySearch
-
U.S. 20 How. 264 264 (1857) Spencer v. LapsleySearch
-
if any, what orders, in a suit in which he is interested. This was much discussed in the Grand Junction Canal Company v. DimesSearch
-
in bar. Such pleading was contrary to the rule and practice of the courts, and was properly disallowed. Shepperd v. GravesSearch
-
Drake v. BranderSearch
-
cause which has been legally dismissed, cannot be questioned for error in this Court. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSearch
-
by the parties cannot be collaterally impeached for the want of the signature. Secombe Page 61 U. S. 270 v. SteeleSearch
-
that lands in a colony thus situated might be sold without reference to the empresario in such a contract. Houston v. RobertsonSearch
-
Jenkins v. ChambersSearch
-
was excluded from their contract in 1834, when Robertson's contract was renewed, and was restored in 1835. Houston v. PerrySearch
-
to complete the titles on a contract of sale, where no organization of the colony had taken place. The case of Clay v. HolbertSearch
-
who officiated in this case, completed the title. The Supreme Court of Texas determined the grant to be valid. Watrons v. McGrewSearch
-
Ryon v. JacksonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Hancock v. McKennySearch
-
was treated as a substantial compliance with the law. A surveyor might adopt the surveys of other persons. Jones v. MenardSearch
-
Howard v. PerrySearch
-
Horton v. PaceSearch
-
Doswell v. LanzoSearch
-
How. 235. In Hoofnagle v. AndersonSearch
-
In Boardman v. ReedSearch
-
White v. BurnleySearch
-
a deputy or other person, as marks of irregularity or of malpractice, our opinion could not be affected. In Stevenson v. NewmanSearch
-
And this Court, after a full review of the subject, in Field v. SeaburySearch
-
Page 61 U. S. 274 Edwards v. JamesSearch
-
Considered as the act of a foreign officer, without the support of this proof, the Supreme Court of Texas, in Paschal v. PerezSearch
-
question, and which was not settled. Story's Conf.Laws 634. But the court in that case, and in the case of De Leon v. WhiteSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Spencer v. LapsleySearch
-
the Grand Junction Canal Company v. DimesSearch
-
Shepperd v. GravesSearch
-
Court. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSearch
-
Houston v. RobertsonSearch
-
Houston v. PerrySearch
-
of Clay v. HolbertSearch
-
Watrons v. McGrewSearch
-
Jones v. MenardSearch
-
In Hoofnagle v. AndersonSearch
-
In Stevenson v. NewmanSearch
-
Edwards v. JamesSearch
-
Paschal v. PerezSearch
-
of De Leon v. WhiteSearch
-
Field v. SeaburySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial