Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Scott Vs. Sandford

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1856

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

83 entries 2 linked 81 unlinked
Show
  1. Loughborough Vs. Blake US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  2. Bailey Vs. Dozier US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1848
  3. U.S. 393 (1856) U.S. Supreme Court Scott v. Sandford
    Search
  4. U.S. 19 How. 393 393 (1856) Scott v. Sandford
    Search
  5. by writ of error, that the Circuit Court had jurisdiction, the judgment must be reversed. The case of Capron v. Van
    Search
  6. maintain his suit without showing that fact in the pleadings. This point was decided in the case of Bingham v. Cabot
    Search
  7. in 3 Dall. 382, and ever since adhered to by the court. And in Jackson v. Ashton
    Search
  8. It is needless to accumulate cases on this subject. Those already referred to, and the cases of Capron v. Van
    Search
  9. Noorden, in 2 Cr. 126, and Montalet v. Murray
    Search
  10. Cr. 46, are sufficient to show the rule of which we have spoken. The case of Capron v. Van
    Search
  11. to the superior court the whole record of the proceedings in the court below. And in the case of the United States v. Smith
    Search
  12. civil authority of the town in which such school or institution might be. And it appears by the case of Crandall v. The
    Search
  13. privileges and immunities were provided for the protection of the citizen in other States. The case of Legrand v. Darnall
    Search
  14. the defendant has not pleaded in abatement to the jurisdiction of the inferior court. The cases of Jackson v. Ashton
    Search
  15. and of Capron v. Van
    Search
  16. not committed an error in taking jurisdiction and giving a judgment for costs in favor of the defendant, for in Capron v. Van
    Search
  17. as altogether inapplicable to the case before us. But the case of the American and Ocean Insurance Companies v. Canter
    Search
  18. the principle on which it depends was decided in this court, upon much consideration, in the case of Strader et al. v. Graham
    Search
  19. his return, and that this case Page 60 U. S. 453 therefore cannot be governed by the case of Strader et al. v. Graham
    Search
  20. argument that the writ must have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court. The case of Strader and others v. Graham
    Search
  21. Burge Con.Laws, pp. 12, 127. We come now to the decision of this court in the case of Strader et al. v. Graham
    Search
  22. and within the State of Missouri, beyond that of the laws of Illinois or those of Ohio in the case of Strader et al. v. Graham
    Search
  23. as the settled law of the State, Page 60 U. S. 466 and, according to the decision in the case of Strader et al. v. Graham
    Search
  24. of fixing his permanent abode. The question we think too plain to require argument. The case of the Attorney General v. Napier
    Search
  25. propounded from this bench. Beginning with the earliest decisions of this court, we have the cases of Bingham v. Cabot
    Search
  26. et al., 3 Dallas 382, Turner v. Eurille
    Search
  27. Dallas 7, Abercrombie v. Dupuis
    Search
  28. Wood v. Wagnon
    Search
  29. Cranch 9, The United States v. The
    Search
  30. brig Union et al., 4 Cranch 216, Sullivan v. The
    Search
  31. Fulton Steamboat Company, 6 Wheaton 450, Mollan et al. v. Torrence
    Search
  32. Wheaton 537, Brown v. Keene
    Search
  33. Peters 112, and Jackson v. Ashton
    Search
  34. to such an extent and so inflexibly has this requisite to the jurisdiction been enforced that in the case of Capron v. Van
    Search
  35. doctrine has been, if possible, more strikingly illustrated in a later decision, the case of The State of Rhode Island v. The
    Search
  36. by Lord Stowell, and of the effect of that principle even in a case of express contract, is seen in the case of Lewis v. Fullerton
    Search
  37. to effectuate an emancipation, for what of a due recording in the county court, as was decided in the case of Givens v. Mann
    Search
  38. from the period of the adoption of the latter. Such is the principle ruled in the cases of Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan
    Search
  39. How. 212, Parmoli v. The
    Search
  40. First Municipality of Page 60 U. S. 491 New Orleans, 3 How. 589, Strader v. Graham
    Search
  41. and the discussions in the State courts have relieved the subject of much of its difficulty. 12 B.M.Ky.R. 545, Foster v. Foster
    Search
  42. Gratt.Va.R. 485, 4 Har. and McH.Md.R. 295, Scott v. Emerson
    Search
  43. and status of the slave although he had never actually possessed the status of freedom in that domicil. Rankin v. Lydia
    Search
  44. A.K.M., Herny v. Decker
    Search
  45. Walk. 36, 4 Mart. 385, 1 Misso. 472, Hunter v. Fulcher
    Search
  46. by broad lines of demarcation in American history. This court has assisted us to define them. In Johnson v. McIntosh
    Search
  47. Harcourt v. Gaillord
    Search
  48. which this court have pronounced condemn the pretension then made on behalf of the legislative department. In Groves v. Slaughter
    Search
  49. In Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan
    Search
  50. which belong to them as the Legislature of the United States, of which these Territories make a part. Loughborough v. Blake
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial