Citation network
Florida Vs. Georgia
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1854
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 478 (1854) U.S. Supreme Court Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U.S. 17 How. 478 478 (1854) Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
have acted in forming its proceedings where a state was a party defendant. The subject came before them in Grayson v. VirginiaSearch
-
and were distinctly asserted in the case of Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
and again in the same case in 40 U. S. 15 Pet. 273, and was recognized in the case of New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
a department, and the United States, though exclusively interested, is not deemed a party to the controversy. Osborn v. BankSearch
-
not the obligee in whose name it was brought, was the party to the suit within the meaning of the Constitution. Brown v. StrodeSearch
-
whose names are on the docket or who argue the causes at the bar. He is not what was termed in the cases of Browne v. StrodeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
by him, though in his name, will be done by the United States. Page 58 U. S. 500 The case of Georgia v. BrailsfordSearch
-
the bar of this Court. 4 Dall. 1. Yet to give the Court jurisdiction, a state must be a party on the record. Osborne v. BankSearch
-
in the name of its chief executive magistrate. So it was declared by the Court in the case of Governor of Georgia v. MadrazoSearch
-
itself a party to the record within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States. In Benton v. WoolseySearch
-
gives notice to all concerned of the pendency of the proceedings, and thus enables them to become parties. In Rose v. HimelySearch
-
United States are plaintiffs, and so it has been administered to this day. There was a case of the United States v. ToddSearch
-
not reported, but it is stated from the record by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TANEY in a note to the case of the United States v. FerreiraSearch
-
The decision of this Court in Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
to act, and leave the parties to terminate their dispute by other means. This is declared by this Court in Hagan v. WalkerSearch
-
How. 36, and the earlier cases lead to the same conclusion. Russell v. Clarke'sSearch
-
Cameron v. RobertsSearch
-
West v. RandallSearch
-
could prevent the circuit court from exercising its jurisdiction over its own execution. The cases of Morgan's Heirs v. MorganSearch
-
there held that a change of domicile did not defeat the jurisdiction which had once attached. In the case of Clarke v. MathewsonSearch
-
complete, and continued to enable the court to Page 58 U. S. 509 adjudicate on that subject matter. In Dun v. ClarkeSearch
-
the equity side of the court to enable the court to control its own execution, and according to the case of Harris v. HardemanSearch
-
excludes all original jurisdiction over such controversies, and even prevents Congress from conferring it. Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
and beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, such a case is without a precedent. 2 Chitty's Pr. 343. The case of Pentland v. QuorringtonSearch
-
So in Drever v. ManderleySearch
-
more than any other suitor to prosecute any proceeding merely vexatious, or which had no legal object. The Queen v. ProsserSearch
-
Beav. 306. The cases cited, of Penn v. LordSearch
-
Baltimore, Hovenden v. AnneslySearch
-
Attorney General v. GalwaySearch
-
and the analogous cases of Dolder v. BankSearch
-
of England and Burgess v. WheatSearch
-
by the fact that they supposed their rights to be violated. The history will bear no other interpretation. In Chisolm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
form the basis of the luminous and masterly judgments in the English chancery in the case of Duke of Brunswick v. KingSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Grayson v. VirginiaSearch
-
of Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
of New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
Osborn v. BankSearch
-
of the Constitution. Brown v. StrodeSearch
-
of Browne v. StrodeSearch
-
of Georgia v. BrailsfordSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial