Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Landes Vs. Brant

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1850

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 2 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Bissell Vs. Penrose US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  2. Chouteau Vs. Eckhart US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1844
  3. U.S. 348 (1850) U.S. Supreme Court Landes v. Brant
    Search
  4. U.S. 10 How. 348 348 (1850) Landes v. Brant
    Search
  5. a record of the General Court of the Territory of Louisiana in the case of Gregoire Sarpy, Executor of Antoine Reihl v. Jacques
    Search
  6. July, 1808. Also a transcript of a record of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in the case of Rufus Easton v. Jacques
    Search
  7. the true and proper assignee under Dodier, through the various mesne conveyances by which Clamorgan claimed. Bissell v. Penrose
    Search
  8. be raised before the courts of justice impeaching this first confirmation. The only question decided in Chouteau v. Eckhart
    Search
  9. How. 345, and in Les Bois v. Bramell
    Search
  10. and it cannot be impeached collaterally. So the Supreme Court of Missouri held in 1848, in the case of Landes v. Perkins
    Search
  11. And section sixth provides that a patent shall issue on a certificate of the Board. In the case of Landes v. Perkins
    Search
  12. as stated in Viner's Abr., tit. Relation, 290. The doctrine of relation is well illustrated in Jackson v. M'Michael
    Search
  13. by the supreme court of New York, 3 Cow. 75, and recognized by the Supreme Court of Missouri in the case of Crowley v. Wallace
    Search
  14. and in him the legal title is vested by the patent. The same rule was applied in the case of Stoddard v. Chambers
    Search
  15. So, again, in the case of Bissell v. Penrose
    Search
  16. is evidence of notice not of the adverse holding only, but of the title under which the possession is held. Hiern v. Mill
    Search
  17. Daniels v. Davison
    Search
  18. And in the United States we deem it to be equally settled. The cases in New York will be found in Gouverneur v. Lynch
    Search
  19. Paige 300, and in Grimstone v. Carter
    Search
  20. id. Page 51 U. S. 376 436, per Walworth, Chancellor. In Kentucky, in Brown v. Anderson
    Search
  21. Litt. 201, and Buck v. Holloway
    Search
  22. so the supreme court of that state held in the case of Landes v. Perkins
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Landes v. Brant
    Search
  24. of Gregoire Sarpy, Executor of Antoine Reihl v. Jacques
    Search
  25. of Rufus Easton v. Jacques
    Search
  26. Les Bois v. Bramell
    Search
  27. of Landes v. Perkins
    Search
  28. Jackson v. M'Michael
    Search
  29. of Crowley v. Wallace
    Search
  30. of Stoddard v. Chambers
    Search
  31. of Bissell v. Penrose
    Search
  32. Hiern v. Mill
    Search
  33. Gouverneur v. Lynch
    Search
  34. Grimstone v. Carter
    Search
  35. Brown v. Anderson
    Search
  36. and Buck v. Holloway
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial