Citation network
irwIn Vs. Dixion
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1850
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 10 (1850) U.S. Supreme Court Irwin v. DixionSearch
-
U.S. 9 How. 10 10 (1850) Irwin v. DixionSearch
-
to a multiplicity of suits, and in cases where an action at law would yield too tardy and imperfect redress. Osborne v. UnitedSearch
-
Jerome v. RossSearch
-
Rowe v. GraniteSearch
-
Stetson v. FaxonSearch
-
City of Georgetown v. AlexSearch
-
Spencer v. LondonSearch
-
Birm. R. Co., 8 Sim. 193, and Sampson v. SmithSearch
-
Wynstanley v. LeeSearch
-
Swanston 337. In this last case, much like the present, an injunction was refused. So Attorney-General v. NicholSearch
-
Ves. 339, and Wilson v. CohenSearch
-
Johns.Ch. 546, in Johnson v. GereSearch
-
Storm v. MannSearch
-
Akrill v. SeldenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Crowder v. TinklerSearch
-
Weller v. SmeatonSearch
-
Cox, 102. See Parker v. PerrySearch
-
Woodworth v. RogersSearch
-
Birch v. HoltSearch
-
Higgins v. WoodwardSearch
-
Attorney General v. HunterSearch
-
Hilton v. GranvilleSearch
-
Craig & Phil. 283, and Harman v. JonesSearch
-
Ingraham v. DunnellSearch
-
Yard v. FordSearch
-
Birm. Can. C. v. LloydSearch
-
Earl of Ripon v. HobartSearch
-
Hart v. MayorSearch
-
Shubrick v. GuerardSearch
-
State v. MayorSearch
-
it is understood that the practice in this last respect is otherwise. In the celebrated case of United States Bank v. OsbornSearch
-
But a case entirely in point on this difficult question in this tribunal is State of Georgia v. BrailsfordSearch
-
use of land, allowed unconditionally and fully to the public for a period of thirty years, or even less. Cincinnati v. WhiteSearch
-
Pick. 78-80. In Jarvis v. DeanSearch
-
be long, as, for instance, over twenty years, and unexplained, the presumption is strong for a dedication. McConnell v. TrusteesSearch
-
Jarvis v. DeanSearch
-
Livett v. WilsonSearch
-
a use of land for a public road must rest on the clear assent of the owner, in some way, to such dedication. Nichols v. AylorSearch
-
Sargent v. BallardSearch
-
and sells the lots accordingly, that he thus means to dedicate those streets to the public. See United States v. ChicagoSearch
-
White v. CowerSearch
-
Barclay v. Howell'sSearch
-
New Orleans v. UnitedSearch
-
And more particularly is it so if the community are allowed to begin to occupy the streets accordingly. Cincinnati v. WhiteSearch
-
private character. It must have been, also, acquiesced in by the owner, and not contested and denied, as here. Nichols v. AylorSearch
-
transcendent or extraordinary power, and is therefore to be used sparingly, and only in a clear and plain case. Rosser v. RandolphSearch
-
Bigelow v. HartfSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Irwin v. DixionSearch
-
Osborne v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial