Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Chicago

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1849

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 6 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Packer Vs. Nixon US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1836
  2. Devereaux Vs. Marr US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1827
  3. Saunders Vs. Gould US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1830
  4. Grant Vs. Raymond US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1832
  5. United States Vs. Ames US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  6. Marbury Vs. Madison US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1803
  7. U.S. 185 (1849) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Chicago
    Search
  8. U.S. 7 How. 185 185 (1849) United States v. Chicago
    Search
  9. than where land is purchased by them in a state. In 1839, soon after the decision of the Supreme Court in Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search
  10. of discretion, rather than arising in the consideration of a motion or point, which was one of discretion. Smith v. Vaughan
    Search
  11. the cause were decided, and in proceedings subsequent thereto, whether discretionary or not. Bank of United States v. Green
    Search
  12. to different stages of the trial, and relate to independent points, they are generally not proper. United States v. Baily
    Search
  13. White v. Truk
    Search
  14. in various stages of the cause, and some of them anticipated and presented, so as to cover the whole case. Leland v. Wilkinson
    Search
  15. has sometimes been given to certificates where, in important cases, a division was certified pro forma, Jones v. Van
    Search
  16. reserved by the General Land Office for military purposes on the application of the Secretary of War. See Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search
  17. local object, though public, and especially one under another government and by mere implication. United States v. Ames
    Search
  18. law or the Constitution, in order to make the right clear to seize and condemn land so situated. West River Bridge v. Dix
    Search
  19. if one allows his land long to be occupied by the public as a highway, such a dedication may be presumed. McConnel v. Trustees
    Search
  20. Wheat. 582. So if the actual user has not been long, but clearly acquiesced in. Jarvis Page 48 U. S. 196 v. Dean
    Search
  21. City of Cincinnati v. White
    Search
  22. Wyman v. Mayor
    Search
  23. of the Supreme Court is limited to the two classes of cases above referred to was held by this Court in Marbury v. Madison
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Chicago
    Search
  25. Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search
  26. Smith v. Vaughan
    Search
  27. Bank of United States v. Green
    Search
  28. United States v. Baily
    Search
  29. Jones v. Van
    Search
  30. of the Secretary of War. See Wilcox v. Jackson
    Search
  31. West River Bridge v. Dix
    Search
  32. McConnel v. Trustees
    Search
  33. United States v. Daniel
    Search
  34. Nesmith v. Sheldon
    Search
  35. United States v. Stone
    Search
  36. Leland v. Wilkinson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial